A lot of work and time but it does strike me as stat-driven, which doesn't appeal to me (but I did at least read it!).
One thing I disagree strongly with is the idea of fewer fences making a race more of a test of speed. It becomes more of a test of stamina as they aren't getting breathers when they jump. It's a bit like the straight mile at Ascot being more of a test of stamina than the round mile where they need to slow down to take the bends and get a chance to fill up.
As for The Changing Man, he might well end up costing me but I have him down as a shiter. I think he'll duck out of a gruelling duel. If he's clear and unchallenged, fair enough, but put him in a dog fight and I reckon he'll show himself to be a dog.
I'm wary of anything rated 148 or more as they'll surely not want to jeopardise any long-term ambitions for the Grand National.
I'll be looking for a potential G1 horse - a second-season novice - getting in off around 140, give or take. Ideally something like Ever Blessed which started the 1999-2000 season off 119 but had been cruising in the lead when falling in the G1 novice race at Aintree - in those days the handicapper couldn't assume how close it would have been at the end but the winner, Spendid, came second to him in the Hennessy itself. Ever Blessed went up from 119 for his seasonal debut and was 10lb 'wrong' in the Hennessy itself but still won.
Phil Smith got a grip in due course and now second-season novices like Ever Blessed wouldn't get a sniff of a mark in the low-130s these days, but I still look for something close.
Strong Flow, off 140 and 2/5f, was running away with the Aintree G1 novice when it fell, got to run in the Hennessy off the same mark and went up to 161 for winning by miles.
That's the type I want. Is there one in the race this year? We shall see.