lol we agree on somthing !No one is under any obligation to solve the Hennessey. There are two outstanding bets on the card in earlier races.
lol we agree on somthing !No one is under any obligation to solve the Hennessey. There are two outstanding bets on the card in earlier races.
Good luckI wouldn't normally touch a Mullins horse in a handicap chase over here (Nash aside) but my main bet today is Ifiwerearichman at Fairyhouse (tracker) who was behind Blizzard of Oz first time out so I'm throwing my darts at him, Monty's and Myretown (gone off Hyland with all the rain forecast.)
Which is absolutely fine - I don't mind, it's all part of the forum rough and tumble.
But my post was intended to be equally light hearted - obviously there's some subtle distinction here I'm spectacularly failing to make.
Anyway, it's No 11 sent in as night watchman in fading light for me from now on with Maurice.
Full toss, ball down the leg side, bouncer (odds on), short of a length just outside the off stump or even a long hop - just inviting the lethal YFUSA pull shot for six into the car park behind the pavilion - they will ALL henceforth be met with the straightest of straight bats!
Any specific reason for that, Maurice?That might have worked, Ian, if I knew the first thing about cricket. (I'm having a go at myself there.)
I'd have thought a joke about 'the word on the street' would have been very obviously a joke.
Wondering if people actually managed to read through another person's post or slag them for having a handful of bets in the one race I'm not sure I see the humour in but I'll accept the fault is with me.
I've been wondering for some time if this forum is really for me any more so you'll be relieved to know that I'll just look in from now on rather than post.
What are these bets mate?
Well, no, I won't be relieved to know that, Maurice, as I've made clear countless times.you'll be relieved to know that I'll just look in from now on rather than post.
Any specific reason for that, Maurice?
"I've been wondering for some time if this forum is really for me any more"For what?
Well, no, I won't be relieved to know that, Maurice, as I've made clear countless times.
I feel like you're playing the victim here, tbh - pretty bewildering as I can remember a time when you posted here you found it amusing that anyone ever takes anything I write literally, or to heart.
As stated, I'm not going to comment either way on anything you post from now on - whether you continue to do that is a matter for you and nothing to do with me.
this whole thing is funny as fkComplete bullshit. I know Maurice has me on ignore so will someone please tell him to shove his tampon back in.
I know!The most hilarious thing about this beef is that Ian's biggest critique of Maurice is that he would rather read his thoughts than him regurgitate the thoughts of experts. Something that he has repeatedly said over the last year or so. So how it can be inertpreted as anything else other than harmless banter is beyond reason.
Thanks for explaining.So many reasons, yorick.
There was a time foul language was blanked out - and I'm guilty of finding ways round that - but I've been getting less comfortable with it as old age catches up with me. I find I'm spending more time in church and examining my conscience more thoroughly and I don't like what I'm finding.
Personal insults used to be pounced on by the mods but they're everywhere now.
People can't put up selections without someone snapping at how ridiculous they are or downright telling them to f off.
And that's just the ones that immediately spring to mind.
I've said more than once that my idea of a forum should resemble a lounge where people with a common interest can share opinions and ideas - information, even - without creating unnecessary friction.
This forum is not that.
It's all banter - we both love our "-folios."And Ian ive only backed 1 more than you.
What's FML stand for?
As for the insults, you're not wrong to say that they're flying around more than ever
I agree.Yorick this is just plain wrong so was what Maurice said about old mods dealing with things. People have done and said things on here in the past that have been absolutely malicious and weren't dealt with and there are plenty of their victims still around to testify.
Yorick this is just plain wrong so was what Maurice said about old mods dealing with things. People have done and said things on here in the past that have been absolutely malicious and weren't dealt with and there are plenty of their victims still around to testify.