Search results

change can be postive or negative and both can very subjective

Here's my trainer stats for all those at Ascot today and tomorrow, you'll have to rename the extension from .doc to .xlsb cos of attachment restrictions here

It's a LONG time since I was at Hexham races

change is not always positive

The only pan danny identifies with is the frying pan

ooohh errrr mrs

Given Danny's love for 'minging stats' means that the spreadsheet view I show might as well be the matrix going down the screen (but we all work best different ways), I put the data through Claude AI to see how it interpreted it and put it into words , the output from my bespoke hard data seems...

Those that were 20/1 are now 14/1 and currently only WH and 888 are offering 16/1

Ennis and Jack were the cowboys I was thinking of......

I've amused myself asking chatgpt and claude trial race questions and comparing them to the hard numbers I have in front of me which I spent a LONG time to be able to produce and are not available to anyone but me other than what I spam threads with sometimes. How useful they are is another...

Just had a vision of you both on one of those day time legal ads :ROFLMAO:

well that gave me laugh !

Nothing really stands out for me at the moment, that might change a bit by the time the final line up and jockeys are known. For Threeunderthrufive the current odds range from 12/1 to 20/1, so who knows which way they'll go by Saturday if they drift I'll be looking for a bit on place only at...

I'm going to have small each way dabble on Threeunderthrufive, currently as much as 20/1, cos it was 2nd by a nose to Victtorino in the Ascot Swinley Chase Handicap 2m 7f 180y Grade3 in Feb, and since 2000, 12 runners have gone from that race to the following Ascot Silver Trophy Cup Chase...

The younger people get the more I think they believe 'everything' is available and 'free' on the internet, there is a lot there and is no doubt why reference books generally don't sell as much as they used to from what I've seen. But in my experience I don't believe either point is true, either...

The pitiful selection of new racing books you see in bookshops these days should tell you a lot. I have my own little library of books and magazines such as Odds On that won't go in the bin til I do

And they're much less useless than some in that the horse numbers & positions are at the bottom of the screen

When getting Claude to have a look at my own data I soon hit limits on the volume it would analyse, even with a none free version. I'm not sure about chatgpt on that score. I've got some time off coming up & there's something I want to try, when you using Claude there is an option to allow it...

They obviously come over sometimes otherwise I wouldn't have stats on their success failure at group races here, but not that much. If you look at flat group 1 total race prize money compared since 2021 it's easy to see why