• REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

    At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

A question for the fitness guru's amongst us!

Aldaniti

Aldaniti

Dormant account
Joined
Dec 21, 2005
Messages
2,360
Location
Wickford
There has to be at least one surely?

Two people same age/weight/metabolic rate etc

One runs five miles & the other walks five miles

Both would burn the same amount of calories?

It didn't sound right when I was told this many moons ago but it came up in a conversation last night & the more I think about the more it perhaps makes sense :confused: after all the walker would be exercising for a lot longer than the runner :blink:
 
Gavin Hastings used to front a TV ad for Scottish Health (now there's a good example of oxymoron).

He started by asking the question, "Did you know that walking a mile uses up the same energy, or calories, as running a mile?"

Presumably it is a matter of the duration of the exercise. You can probably run a mile in under eight minutes but it would probably take 15-20 minutes to walk it.
 
Apparently short, sharp bursts followed by a period of recuperation are optimal.

So say 2 pints in fifteen minutes, followed by a single pint in twenty minutes, followed by 2 in fifteen and one in twenty etc etc would be ideal.

This may also apply to fitness...
 
In fitness that is called HIRT training trackside. In drinking I think it just hurts.
 
If one eats all the packets in a multi packet of crisps in one sitting, they are less calories than if one spreads them out over several days. I have spent years proving this and know it to be true.:whistle:
 
Back
Top