• REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

    At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

The figure over jumps is 33% of course (still well below what's normally required) Champleve, Azertyuiop, Well Chief and VPU were all 100%, as indeed Moscow Flyer would have been on completed starts. Only Ventana Canyon 40% and Contraband 25% were under a 66% threshold.

 

I take on board that jumping and hurdles are different and clearly some horses are better equipped than others to perform the task, but losing horses tend to make a habit of it, as even if the horse always was a prospective chaser, there shoudl have been enough opportunities for his class to push his career record beyond 18% regardless of the obstacles. It all suggests to me that he lacks the required class to win races. By the time they took their Arkle in most aspiring group 1 winners would expect to be over 50%.

 

 

Champleve 80%

Or Royal 62%

Tidal Bay 58%

Well Chief 57%

Azerty 55%

Flagship 55%

VPU 55%

MWDS 50%

Moscow 48%

Contraband 38%

Ventana 33%

 

There's a quite tight spread there with 5 horses covered by just 3%, or 8 by 10%.

 

At 18% Calgary Bay is way off the radar. Even the poorest career performer has twice his strike rate.

 

I think the horse has been subjected to quick races before, but the only time he's been subjected to a really fast one at Championship speed (winners TS's against RPR's) that I could find he came 18th.

 

As someone who's fond of the gospel of St Paul, you might be interested to hear what Nicholls said of the horse at a preview evening in Exeter.

 

" I can't have Calgary Bay, his form isn't great. He's a decent horse but not for me."


5 + 3 = ?
Back
Top