When a herd has a TT, the cattle are given two different tests - one is for bovine TB and one is for avian TB - the results are read four days later and the vets always place the avian TB test above the bovine one - that's why farmers know if they have reactors, because you'll hear them muttering 'the bird flies over the cow' as they check to see if the lowest test has reacted ! So yes, all avians can get avian TB!
There have been many suggestions as to the level of minerals, trace elements and vitamins and the incidence of TB - selenium is one, zinc another and it is common knowledge that the accuracy of the tests themselves are influenced by trace element levels.
The likelihood of maize as a source of infection could only be factored in if the organic herd had been fed on organic maize silage and then the anecdotal evidence would have been much stronger. However, also anecdotally, I can certainly see the logic of this, as badgers adore maize and can cause quite amazing amounts of devastation to a maize crop and also clamped maize silage and, regardless of whether low selenium levels are a root cause of TB, if they were carriers it wouldn't have been difficult for them to have infected the cattle, sadly.
There also a lot of other factors to take into account. Presumably, he has two separate farms (well, he must have if he's running organic and non-organic herds!) and it would have been useful to know the actual numbers of badgers on each farm. I still believe excessive numbers which are pressured as to territory are more likely to to be susceptible to any kind of disease.
Changing the diet of his cattle and removing a prime source of 'free' food for the badgers may well have resulted in a lowering of the badger numbers. It will be interesting for us this year as Phil has only one field of maize scheduled and so 'our' badgers will find food a little harder to come by.
Did the farmer blood test his organic and non-organic herds for their trace elements? I'm about to buy in some Belgian Blue cross heifers and the first thing that will happen to them is a routine blood test to see if they have any deficiencies and then they will be routinely injected with a vitamin/trace element booster to compensate.
It's certainly an interesting study and I am sure it can do no harm in maintaining the correct levels of trace elements etc to promote herd health.
Although I know you will hear about angry farmers who want mass destruction of badgers, you ought to be able to realise that, like any other media reporting, they are chosen because they are 'interesting' to the listener. I am in a TB hot-spot and I know an awful lot of farmers and I haven't yet come across anyone who wants mass culling of badgers. What they do want is a TB test that is totally accurate, they want selective culling of infected badgers sets (which would appear to be a real possibility now that research has been completed that can tell which setts are infected) and a properly co-ordinated effort by DEFRA to ensure that, as farmers are taking the full cost of pre-movement testing themselves, that it is should be done in tandem with a measured cull. No one can see the point of pre-movement testing if one half of the equation still isn't dealt with!
There is no moral difference between a dead badger and a dead cow. If we can develop a system whereby TB can be eliminated and not the animals, that is where all our efforts and taxes should be directed.