Well a year ago 2 friendly firms laid me £25 Ew on a certain Dubai Destination o/o Gossamer for the 2008 2000 Guineas at 125/1, however this time around even the big three won't honour a price on a horse in May for the Guineas.
Having rung Ladbrokes, Hills and Corals not one of them would lay a price on a filly for the 2009 1000 Guineas, they all said similar we wont price Classic horses up until after Royal Ascot.
So what has happened in the past year to make bookmakers lose their bottle.
You read in the paper about people getting 100/1 on their kids playing a match for England or scoring a goal at Wembley, so how come the ante post bookmakers wont even lay a price on a 2yo which is doing no more than swinging canters at home for a classic, nearly a yer prior to the race.
Only one firm gave me a price and incidently went 125/1, but that was after they asked how much i wanted on. I said £50 each way and the lady went away and said they would only lay £10 ew at this moment in time.
So then gave her the horse details and she came back with 125/1. Now she said do you want the 125/1 on that and for £10 each way.
I took the bet but for me it seems stupid that a, 3 much bigger firms wouldn't lay a price and seocndly the one that did would only lay £20 on it.
The question I want to know is how in gods name do the likes of Harry Findlay get on say Denman to win a gold cup as a novice unraced at 66/1, it bares thinking, are bookmakers suddenly getting scared or is it a fact that they don't actually want to lay a bet that may win anymore.
Its a joke in my opinion, all i wanted was 50 ew on the bloody horse.
Having rung Ladbrokes, Hills and Corals not one of them would lay a price on a filly for the 2009 1000 Guineas, they all said similar we wont price Classic horses up until after Royal Ascot.
So what has happened in the past year to make bookmakers lose their bottle.
You read in the paper about people getting 100/1 on their kids playing a match for England or scoring a goal at Wembley, so how come the ante post bookmakers wont even lay a price on a 2yo which is doing no more than swinging canters at home for a classic, nearly a yer prior to the race.
Only one firm gave me a price and incidently went 125/1, but that was after they asked how much i wanted on. I said £50 each way and the lady went away and said they would only lay £10 ew at this moment in time.
So then gave her the horse details and she came back with 125/1. Now she said do you want the 125/1 on that and for £10 each way.
I took the bet but for me it seems stupid that a, 3 much bigger firms wouldn't lay a price and seocndly the one that did would only lay £20 on it.
The question I want to know is how in gods name do the likes of Harry Findlay get on say Denman to win a gold cup as a novice unraced at 66/1, it bares thinking, are bookmakers suddenly getting scared or is it a fact that they don't actually want to lay a bet that may win anymore.
Its a joke in my opinion, all i wanted was 50 ew on the bloody horse.