Christians and Jews as fair game, he never gives Muslims the same doing over.Peter Tatchell, human rights campaigner
It was very funny, but I was always laughing rather nervously. The jokes were sailing very close to being offensive. The whole thing was a parody, so I suppose he gets away with it. But there's part of me that thinks he's just an updated version of Bernard Manning. All his jokes are at the expense of minority groups and he plays a lot to basic prejudice
Cohen is often parodying prejudice and, because it is so over the top, he arguably ridicules and undermines bigotry. However, I worry that certain people might take Borat seriously. They could see him as reinforcing and validating their lumpen mentality.
Taken at face value, the film is offensive to women and minorities. But the subtext is quite complex, ambiguous and often subversive. Many of the victims of his scurrilous send-ups are small-town middle Americans. Borat gives them the rope to hang themselves. He's baiting them. They express real ignorance and prejudice, whereas Borat is only acting.
Some of the old Ali G sketches had more than a whiff of homophobia to them, but I don't find Borat anti-gay. If anything, his attempts to greet American men with a French-style kiss on the cheeks provokes negative reactions that expose the homophobia of others.
The Running of the Jews sketch made me feel uncomfortable. I know it was parody, but it pandered to anti-semitic stereotypes. Cohen's satire obviously has its limits. He self-censors. Although he regards
Hilarious in its own way
Talk about missing the whole point of Borat by a country mile
Should people without a sense of humour be allowed (or even worse, comment on) satire?