REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

Hardly

Close to midday on June 30th, Boris Johnson announced he wasn't standing (about 10 mins before the deadline). This was clearly dominating the news cycle and its was symptomatic of the Tories being under pressue. Shortly after midday (with the focus on Boris) you made an oblique reference to Labour (#1247) which was widely ignored, except for Brendan who suggested you were boringly predictable "your daily Corbyn obsessions" (#1252). Most of us were probably aware of the Labour Jewish story that was humming in the background from the morning, and that you were trying to introduce this. After about 90 mins of no one taking any notice of your post, you came back and tried again in post (#1257) but this time you weren't leaving as much to chance and chose to link a piece from the Daily Mirror so no one could be under any doubt what you'd rather talk about instead. There were dozens of things you could have used by way of ammunition to take aim at both Labour and Corbyn, many of which were more relevant to their predicament, but obsessive that you are, you chose a Jewish angle

The record clearly shows you to be the origin of this line of conversation (despite claiming you were responding to someone else, who you've still failed to identify). Again you were widely ignored by everyone other than Icebreaker (#1260, #1263, #1264, #1265) as the two of you engaged in a little bit of 'circle jerking' (fair enough). Everyone else wasn't bothered and kept out of it. Eventually Desert Orchird chimed in (#1268) and that sets in train the chain of events

That's not lying about your posts, it's there in black and white. People can make their own minds up as to why within an hour of Boris Johnson pulling out, (the clear story of the day) you so blatantly attempted to steer the conversation onto Corbyn anti-semite territory. Our silence isn't an endorsement. It's just a recognition of the fact we'd rather concentrate on what we believe to be more relevant and interesting, and not get sucked into your personal agendas. People can also speculate how things might have developed had you not sought such an unnecessary diversion, or even if you had gone and started another thread as at least one person appealed to you to do

<blockquote data-quote="Warbler" data-source="post: 2543569" data-attributes="member: 65228">HardlyClose to midday on June 30th, Boris Johnson announced he wasn&#039;t standing (about 10 mins before the deadline). This was clearly dominating the news cycle and its was symptomatic of the Tories being under pressue. Shortly after midday (with the focus on Boris) you made an oblique reference to Labour (#1247) which was widely ignored, except for Brendan who suggested you were boringly predictable &quot;your daily Corbyn obsessions&quot; (#1252). Most of us were probably aware of the Labour Jewish story that was humming in the background from&nbsp; the morning, and that you were trying to introduce this. After about 90 mins of no one taking any notice of your post, you came back and tried again in post (#1257) but this time you weren&#039;t leaving as much to chance and chose to link a piece from the Daily Mirror so no one could be under any doubt what you&#039;d rather talk about instead. There were dozens of things you could have used by way of ammunition to take aim at both Labour and Corbyn, many of which were more relevant to their predicament, but obsessive that you are, you chose a Jewish angleThe record clearly shows you to be the origin of this line of conversation (despite claiming you were responding to someone else, who you&#039;ve still failed to identify). Again you were widely ignored by everyone other than Icebreaker (#1260, #1263, #1264, #1265) as the two of you engaged in a little bit of &#039;circle jerking&#039; (fair enough). Everyone else wasn&#039;t bothered and kept out of it. Eventually Desert Orchird chimed in (#1268) and that sets in train the chain of eventsThat&#039;s not lying about your posts, it&#039;s there in black and white. People can make their own minds up as to why within an hour of Boris Johnson pulling out, (the clear story of the day) you so blatantly attempted to steer the conversation onto Corbyn anti-semite territory. Our silence isn&#039;t an endorsement. It&#039;s just a recognition of the fact we&#039;d rather concentrate on what we believe to be more relevant and interesting, and not get sucked into your personal agendas. People can also speculate how things might have developed had you not sought such an unnecessary diversion, or even if you had gone and started another thread as at least one person appealed to you to do</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Warbler, post: 2543569, member: 65228"] Hardly Close to midday on June 30th, Boris Johnson announced he wasn't standing (about 10 mins before the deadline). This was clearly dominating the news cycle and its was symptomatic of the Tories being under pressue. Shortly after midday (with the focus on Boris) you made an oblique reference to Labour (#1247) which was widely ignored, except for Brendan who suggested you were boringly predictable "your daily Corbyn obsessions" (#1252). Most of us were probably aware of the Labour Jewish story that was humming in the background from the morning, and that you were trying to introduce this. After about 90 mins of no one taking any notice of your post, you came back and tried again in post (#1257) but this time you weren't leaving as much to chance and chose to link a piece from the Daily Mirror so no one could be under any doubt what you'd rather talk about instead. There were dozens of things you could have used by way of ammunition to take aim at both Labour and Corbyn, many of which were more relevant to their predicament, but obsessive that you are, you chose a Jewish angle The record clearly shows you to be the origin of this line of conversation (despite claiming you were responding to someone else, who you've still failed to identify). Again you were widely ignored by everyone other than Icebreaker (#1260, #1263, #1264, #1265) as the two of you engaged in a little bit of 'circle jerking' (fair enough). Everyone else wasn't bothered and kept out of it. Eventually Desert Orchird chimed in (#1268) and that sets in train the chain of events That's not lying about your posts, it's there in black and white. People can make their own minds up as to why within an hour of Boris Johnson pulling out, (the clear story of the day) you so blatantly attempted to steer the conversation onto Corbyn anti-semite territory. Our silence isn't an endorsement. It's just a recognition of the fact we'd rather concentrate on what we believe to be more relevant and interesting, and not get sucked into your personal agendas. People can also speculate how things might have developed had you not sought such an unnecessary diversion, or even if you had gone and started another thread as at least one person appealed to you to do [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?