Cheltenham Old Course v New Course

Len Madeiros

Rookie
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
1,142
Location
London
What's the difference, please? I understand the racing takes place on the old course for the the first two days and the new course for the last two days, but to a casual observer they look identical. Is one on the inside of the other and therefore a bit tighter on the bends? Would running on the new/old course suit different horses more than others?

Thanks for any clarification.
 
The old course is used for the Open Meeting in November and for the first two days of the Festival in March, hosting the Champion Hurdle and Queen Mother Champion Chase as well as the Supreme Novices' Hurdle, Arkle Chase, Neptune Novices' Hurdle and RSA Chase. It's probably safe to say it favours the more speedy horse or those that travel well through their race.

Racing is staged on the New Course for the December Gold Cup meeting, Festival Trials Day in January and the last two days of the Cheltenham Festival in March, where it plays host to the Cheltenham Gold Cup as well as World Hurdle, Triumph Hurdle and Ryanair Chase.
Both courses demand stamina. The old course is on the outside going away from the stands but cuts back on the inside of the New Course again well before the home straight.

Mick Fitzgerald sums it up well here;


"To the naked eye, or to the layman, Cheltenham looks very stiff, but the two courses are actually totally different and I rate the Old Course much the quicker. So, especially on that, you need a horse that can travel easily within itself. Without one of those, you invariably find yourself snookered, because you’re always trying to get into a position to improve.

“IF YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT GOING FOR A GAP, NINE TIMES OUT OF TEN IT’S TOO LATE”
Ideally, therefore, you need a horse that can get into a gap as soon as one appears, because there’s so little time to manoeuvre. If you have to think about going for a gap, nine times out of ten it’s too late - someone else will have got into it before you.

As for the uphill finish, it only rides really testing if you’re on one that’s tying up. Then, it feels like an eternity from the last to the line."
 
Choc Thornton had a very informative article in Racing Post some years back.
Said much the same as Mick Fitz.
Hopefully RUK will do as informative a guide to the tracks as they did at Kempton before the Winter Festival.
 
Reading it again, why would the old course be faster if it goes the longer way round than the new course? Surely there would be more room?
 
The downhill on the new course is outside that of the old course.
The run from the 2nd last to last hurdle is 3 furlongs or so; impossible for a hold up horse to get cover. Also old chase track had only one fence in home straight up to 2011.
Check out Harchibald County Hurdle run of 2004 v his Champion Hurdle of the following year.
 
The downhill on the new course is outside that of the old course.
The run from the 2nd last to last hurdle is 3 furlongs or so; impossible for a hold up horse to get cover. Also old chase track had only one fence in home straight up to 2011.
Check out Harchibald County Hurdle run of 2004 v his Champion Hurdle of the following year.

All making sense now - cheers, Edgt.
 
Back
Top