REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

This is the same WHO that have changed various parts of their advice on a consistent basis since the initial outbreak. Almost as though it's a moving target that we don't know everything about.

We must all follow the rules set out and wait and see how it goes. Once this is all over we can then give the Government the criticism it deserves (there will be plenty), and the praise it deserves (there will be plenty). Until then, or if there's any deviation from the current global patterns, we just don't know whether the measures are correct.

I personally look at the huge number of people losing their jobs and livelihoods globally and wonder whether these measures are worth sacrificing the lives of many in the long term to save the lives of a few in the short term. That's something that probably won't be able to be answered for a decade, but it's why I appreciate that it's a delicate balancing act. There appears to be some that would have you think that people don't normally die.

<blockquote data-quote="AliGupter" data-source="post: 2617099" data-attributes="member: 65170">This is the same WHO that have changed various parts of their advice on a consistent basis since the initial outbreak. Almost as though it&#039;s a moving target that we don&#039;t know everything about.We must all follow the rules set out and wait and see how it goes. Once this is all over we can then give the Government the criticism it deserves (there will be plenty), and the praise it deserves (there will be plenty). Until then, or if there&#039;s any deviation from the current global patterns, we just don&#039;t know whether the measures are correct.I personally look at the huge number of people losing their jobs and livelihoods globally and wonder whether these measures are worth sacrificing the lives of many in the long term to save the lives of a few in the short term. That&#039;s something that probably won&#039;t be able to be answered for a decade, but it&#039;s why I appreciate that it&#039;s a delicate balancing act. There appears to be some that would have you think that people don&#039;t normally die.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AliGupter, post: 2617099, member: 65170"] This is the same WHO that have changed various parts of their advice on a consistent basis since the initial outbreak. Almost as though it's a moving target that we don't know everything about. We must all follow the rules set out and wait and see how it goes. Once this is all over we can then give the Government the criticism it deserves (there will be plenty), and the praise it deserves (there will be plenty). Until then, or if there's any deviation from the current global patterns, we just don't know whether the measures are correct. I personally look at the huge number of people losing their jobs and livelihoods globally and wonder whether these measures are worth sacrificing the lives of many in the long term to save the lives of a few in the short term. That's something that probably won't be able to be answered for a decade, but it's why I appreciate that it's a delicate balancing act. There appears to be some that would have you think that people don't normally die. [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?