REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

Retirements, Long Term Injuries and Departures 2014

I've pointed out twice now that it shouldn't be continued on here cruella - I completely agree with your first sentence. It did start out being about a deceased horse!

Ardross - grow up and get over the fact that I called you out for being ridiculous. I don't recall any suggestions from you before the meeting that it would be unsafe - so to come out with what you did after was unfair on the many people (ie the trainers and jockeys who were actually AT the course that day) who didn't have an issue and basically implying that every one of them was asking for trouble by running.

As for the suggestion about me not thinking anyone involved doesn't have a valid opinion - you couldn't be further from the truth as you well know. It just happens that this time I think you were wrong. Sorry you don't like it, but frankly to keep dragging this out is getting more than a bit pathetic. start a new thread or bring it to PM if you want any more attention from me, I won't be doing it on this thread.

Here's hoping that whatever went wrong with cirrus is soon mended.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

<blockquote data-quote="trudij" data-source="post: 2462050" data-attributes="member: 65037">Retirements, Long Term Injuries and Departures 2014I&#039;ve pointed out twice now that it shouldn&#039;t be continued on here cruella - I completely agree with your first sentence. It did start out being about a deceased horse! Ardross - grow up and get over the fact that I called you out for being ridiculous. I don&#039;t recall any suggestions from you before the meeting that it would be unsafe - so to come out with what you did after was unfair on the many people (ie the trainers and jockeys who were actually AT the course that day) who didn&#039;t have an issue and basically implying that every one of them was asking for trouble by running. As for the suggestion about me not thinking anyone involved doesn&#039;t have a valid opinion - you couldn&#039;t be further from the truth as you well know. It just happens that this time I think you were wrong. Sorry you don&#039;t like it, but frankly to keep dragging this out is getting more than a bit pathetic. start a new thread or bring it to PM if you want any more attention from me, I won&#039;t be doing it on this thread. Here&#039;s hoping that whatever went wrong with cirrus is soon mended. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</blockquote>

[QUOTE="trudij, post: 2462050, member: 65037"] [b]Retirements, Long Term Injuries and Departures 2014[/b] I've pointed out twice now that it shouldn't be continued on here cruella - I completely agree with your first sentence. It did start out being about a deceased horse! Ardross - grow up and get over the fact that I called you out for being ridiculous. I don't recall any suggestions from you before the meeting that it would be unsafe - so to come out with what you did after was unfair on the many people (ie the trainers and jockeys who were actually AT the course that day) who didn't have an issue and basically implying that every one of them was asking for trouble by running. As for the suggestion about me not thinking anyone involved doesn't have a valid opinion - you couldn't be further from the truth as you well know. It just happens that this time I think you were wrong. Sorry you don't like it, but frankly to keep dragging this out is getting more than a bit pathetic. start a new thread or bring it to PM if you want any more attention from me, I won't be doing it on this thread. Here's hoping that whatever went wrong with cirrus is soon mended. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?