REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

I probably would. But if it came out, in court, that the camcorder had actually been legally purchased elsewhere and my observation was merely a misunderstanding then I would hope that I would be able to revise my opinion.

On the matter of Mr Blair, I believe that he, in turn, believed that he was acting in a morally and legally correct fashion prior to subsequent information (or lack of it)coming to light.

I do not believe that he knowingly committed what he believed to be a war crime. Whether he did or not, as the case will never come to court, is a matter for debate.

[QUOTE="simmo, post: 2086918, member: 65084"] I probably would. But if it came out, in court, that the camcorder had actually been legally purchased elsewhere and my observation was merely a misunderstanding then I would hope that I would be able to revise my opinion. On the matter of Mr Blair, [b]I believe[/b] that he, in turn, believed that he was acting in a morally and legally correct fashion prior to subsequent information (or lack of it)coming to light. I [i]do not[/i] believe that he knowingly committed what he believed to be a war crime. Whether he did or not, as the case will never come to court, is a matter for debate. [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?