Desert Orchid
Senior Jockey
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2005
- Messages
- 25,641
Might be an idea to point out how misleading these can be.
For example, for tomorrow at Ayr the going stick reading is 6.7 and the ground is given as 'soft, heavy in places' (with heavy, soft in places, on the back straight).
For Newmarket tomorrow the reading is 6.8 and the going is given as good to firm.
At Ayr yesterday the times suggested the going description was accurate although the races panned out as though the ground was fine, in the sense that they weren't strung out like washing during or at the end and they seemed to be finishing well enough. One winner had twice previously been withdrawn elsewhere due to soft ground this season.
The last few Newmarket meetings I've seen on TV have looked as though the ground was much softer than given. Had they been over-watering during the long dry spell? Was a passing shower have an abnormal effect on the ground?
I don't know. I'm just asking.
For example, for tomorrow at Ayr the going stick reading is 6.7 and the ground is given as 'soft, heavy in places' (with heavy, soft in places, on the back straight).
For Newmarket tomorrow the reading is 6.8 and the going is given as good to firm.
At Ayr yesterday the times suggested the going description was accurate although the races panned out as though the ground was fine, in the sense that they weren't strung out like washing during or at the end and they seemed to be finishing well enough. One winner had twice previously been withdrawn elsewhere due to soft ground this season.
The last few Newmarket meetings I've seen on TV have looked as though the ground was much softer than given. Had they been over-watering during the long dry spell? Was a passing shower have an abnormal effect on the ground?
I don't know. I'm just asking.
Last edited: