REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

Basing it on actual fences jumped, and including "not fluents", he has an error rate almost 4 times higher at Cheltenham than everywhere else put together. But given that around a third of all of his jumping errors recorded in the comments in running occurred in last year's Gold Cup, that's probably not too surprising.

Away from there, it's much of a muchness. Oh, and the comments record Sam Thomas directing him into the upright of a fence at Haydock as a "mistake" which is a tad unfair...

[QUOTE="Harbinger, post: 2175994, member: 65089"] Basing it on actual fences jumped, and including "not fluents", he has an error rate almost 4 times higher at Cheltenham than everywhere else put together. But given that around a third of [i]all[/i] of his jumping errors recorded in the comments in running occurred in last year's Gold Cup, that's probably not too surprising. Away from there, it's much of a muchness. Oh, and the comments record Sam Thomas directing him into the upright of a fence at Haydock as a "mistake" which is a tad unfair... [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?