Goodbye Michael Howard

BrianH

At the Start
Joined
May 3, 2003
Messages
6,108
Location
Banstead, Surrey
So, Michael Howard has resigned as Tory leader. Let the battle commence. The contenders, with Ladbroke's prices:

David Davis: 5-2

The 2001 leadership election was better than most at raising hitherto unheard-of Tories to some form of public prominence. While most in the party would no doubt regret the IDS era, the battle to succeed William Hague brought David Davis out of the murky world of the Public Accounts Committee and into the spotlight as a potential future party leader.

Having survived the Liberal Democrats' decapitation strategy, the MP for Haltemprice and Howden is now the favourite to lead the Tories into a third term in opposition. He would be likely to move the party from its fiscal caution under Mr Howard and make a direct appeal to the tax-cutting libertarian wing.

But it is not all small government and slimmed down public spending from the former member of the Territorial SAS. He is also a Eurosceptic who talks tough on crime and immigration. Frederick Forsyth has said he likes "the cut of his jib". (Oh dear - BrianH)

Liam Fox: 6-1

As the party's co-chairman for the 2005 election, alongside Lord Saatchi, Liam Fox finally managed to put behind him endlessly mistold and mangled stories about him dating the Neighbours actor turned pop star Natalie Imbruglia. Suddenly, he became a lot less interesting.

During the campaign, Dr Fox propped up Mr Howard on immigration, and - unlike Mr Davis - expressed no interest in the top job if it became vacant. He simply said he was looking forward to resting once the election was over. His cattiest comments were reserved for Mr Davis - speaking about his battle to retain his Haltemprice and Howden seat, Dr Fox remarked: "He's got matinee-idol looks, but we'll have to see."

Until Mr Howard moved him to the co-chairmanship, Dr Fox's background in medicine (he is a real doctor) made him a natural health spokesman. Since then, though, he has established himself as a social conservative and Eurosceptic. On the Monday before the election, he gave a speech warning that Tony Blair's admiration for Europe posed a threat to the future of the UK. This was interpreted in some quarters as the beginning of his leadership bid. He will campaign from the right.

David Cameron: 9/1

If the Tories choose to make a decisive break with the Major government, David Cameron will be in a strong position to be the next leader. He joined parliament in 2001 and, as the most prominent member of the so-called Notting Hill set, has the air of a clean-cut moderniser. George Osbourne, meanwhile, is spoken of as a Brown to his Blair.

Mr Cameron was head of policy co-ordination in the last shadow cabinet, but his closeness to the intellectual heart of the Howard era might become a problem if there are recriminations over the campaign. Senior Tories may not be ready for so young and inexperienced a leader as 38-year-old Mr Cameron.

Pre-election reports that he and Mr Osbourne were "deeply embarrassed" over Mr Howard's focus on immigration led some frontbenchers to express exasperation with the Notting Hill set for attacking a campaign they helped to draw up. Mr Davis, if running, would be likely to portray Mr Cameron as a continuation of the Howard era. It was one of his allies, backbencher Derek Conway, who first dismissed the clique around the former leader as the habitues of "curious little bistros" in Notting Hill.

Andrew Lansley: 10/1

A civil servant who became a parliamentarian via a spell in Tory policy units, Andrew Lansley has a reputation for being intelligent and informed. He was one of the architects of the surprise 1992 election victory, but his association with the 2001 campaign put the brakes on his frontbench career until Mr Howard made him spokesman for health.

His inclination towards dramatic reform was suggested two years ago when he made a lone call for the party to rename itself the Reform Conservatives to show that it was modernising.

Theresa May: 12/1

The first Tory since the days of Ken Clarke's Hush Puppies to be known for her shoes, Theresa May is the only woman who could plausibly run for the leadership. She horrified the Tories in 2002 when, as chairman, she said the public thought of them as the "nasty party", but insisted in the 2005 campaign that this was no longer the case.

Instead, she told GMTV: "I think people will now see, I hope, that the Conservative party is listening to them and addressing the issues that really matter to them."

Malcolm Rifkind: 12/1

A Tory moderate, Malcolm Rifkind returned to parliament for Kensington and Chelsea eight years after losing his Scottish seat to Labour. Mr Rifkind is a returning big beast, but it is not clear whether he would be interested in leading the party.

The former foreign minister has spoken in support of Blairite policies such as private finance initiatives and foundation hospitals, but said a Tory government would be needed to implement them properly.

Oliver Letwin: 16/1

Shadow chancellor since 2003, Oliver Letwin should be towards the top of his party's pecking order when it looks for a new leader, but appears to have failed to translate his seniority into authority.

This is partly because of the Liberal Democrat "decapitation" strategy, which kept him in his Dorset West constituency and out of the national campaign. Part of it is also because he is on the party's liberal wing at a time when the right is in the ascendant.

William Hague: 20/1

A well-known and respected figure, but the many gaffes during the former leader's four years at the top - from the baseball cap to the disastrous "keep the pound" campaign - mean few would want to try William Hague again.

He may also be content, for the moment, to write history books and serve in parliament as the member for Richmond.

Ken Clarke: 40/1

The biggest of the remaining Tory big beasts, the former chancellor has not ruled himself out of another leadership run. Kenneth Clarke stood for the leadership in 1997 on a supposed dream ticket with John Redwood - losing to William Hague - but, in a recent magazine interview, mischievously suggested he had not yet written his political memoirs because he was only "midway" through his political career.

He is too pro-European for the majority of Tory MPs to accept as their leader, but remains a popular and recognisable figure outside the party. He criticised Mr Howard during the campaign for calling Tony Blair a liar.

Boris Johnson: 66/1

The MP for Henley-on-Thames is probably the Tories' best known parliamentarian, but Boris Johnson has suffered in the eyes of the party over the last year. First, he was first sent to Liverpool on a tour of contrition after an editorial in the Spectator - the magazine he edits - criticised the city's "deeply unattractive psyche," when commenting on its response to the murder in Iraq of Kenneth Bigley.

Then he was dismissed from the front bench over accusations that he lied about a four-year extramarital affair with the Spectator writer Petronella Wyatt.

Mr Johnson would need to commit himself fully to Westminster if he were to mount a serious challenge at some time in the future.

Boris would be hilarious but should be 66,000/1. My choice, but not for betting purposes, would be Ken Clarke, but I'm afraid that he has no chance either. Rifkind or Letwin would be the nearest to the old "one nation" Tories, who were to the left of Blair - though probably not Brown - but I fear that the party is still not ready for a return to consensus politics. The SAS man cometh? - BrianH
 
Oh for someone with a bit of real charisma. Boris would be a breath of fresh air, but is capable of doing something stupid to lose the next election. I would imagine the Tories need only to avoid doing something stupid to win next time so they will pick someone safe and boring (which they seem to do in all circumstances anyway).
 
It is a field of banded race quality - I should like a Redwood Widdicombe nightmare ticket . That would keep them out of power for another 12 years .
 
William Hague. Dad is well-connected politically (through his job)& he told me 6 months ago that the plan was that the Tories expected to be beaten again and that they would bring back Hague after they had been beaten. The general idea being that he was too young last time around & that he will run rings around Bliar as he has a far more brilliant political mind. Now, before you all commence the shooting, can I please point out that I am just passing on what I have been told!!!!!
 
Whatever the quality of his political mind - the 2001 campaign shows that old 15 pints lacks judgment big time .
 
As I said, if you read my post, the general idea is that he was too young & inexperienced to make a good leader last time around.

And besides, Bliar is - what??? He has fantastic judgement does he??
 
While Hague was always good entertainment value at the despatch box during PMQ, I would certainly argue against his political skills - look where they got him! Plus I don't think he wants it, and isn't frightened of saying so.

He'd be bigger than 20/1 with me.
 
I'm just passing on what I've heard - and Dad says he regularly ran rings around Bliar during PMQ as Bliar just wasn't intelligent enough to keep up.
 
It's not a question of intelligence - the skills required at PMQ are those of a good salesman or a stand-up comic, mainly the ability to think on one's feet. You also have to be well briefed but while Hague was good at grasping and remembering the brief Blair is also excellent in that area. I missed him on Wednesdays when he left.

But, as Ardross says, he displayed too many failings of political awareness. Can you imagine a Wilson or a MacMillan, arch-politicians both, let alone Blair:

(1) Wearing a back-to-front baseball cap.

(2) Boasting of drinking fifteen pints a day (and then having witnesses appear to rubbish it!)

(3) Launching a "Save the Pound" campaign by handing out little lapel badges

(4) Having the media at his wrestling matches with Sebastian Coe (causing one journo to draw the comparison with Oliver Reed and Alan bates in "Women In Love"!)
 
Would you look at that - didn't get on at the 20/1 & now the best price available is just over 6/1 on BF for Hague; at one point he got as low as 2/1 yesterday after a massive gamble on him! I can't be that far out then.....
 
I was - ok, "what I was told" can't be too far out - happy now??!!! Besides, it's still splitting hairs - the whole idea of Hague coming back was rubbished on here....
 
This is true - Hague was given out on a tipping line!!! Hence the bets for him yesterday. I would be a massive layer at 2/1 - they've got to choose someone with hair eventually...
 
Shadow Leader being put away by Brian H. Shocking stuff IMO.
icon_eek.gif
 
The only one I can relate to is Ken Clarke. The rest come across as oily or overboyish. But sadly, the only Tory I remotely liked has resigned: that's Nicholas Soames, who loves great food and drink, and is wonderfully un-PC, thank God. He'd have probably brought back the stocks and pillory for wretched 'antisocial' scroats. There's nowt like seeing who the little bastads are, and saving up your rotten eggs for them.
 
David Cameron is currently two years older than William Hague was when he became leader - and he has hair. They definitely want to change their leadership policy and elect someone who is not bald.

Seriously though, I have not yet had a bet on DC, as probably the voting system will need to be changed before he can get the job.
 
Back
Top