Eric
As far as I am concerned, The O'Neill yard is seemingly "under a cloud" for about 70-80% of every season.
A few months ago, I started a thread on here about how bad a trainer I thought he was and, to be honest, thought I it would stir up some controversy/heated debate. In the end, I was amazed that almost everyone on here seemed to agree with me.
I am at the stage now where I very rarely back his horses. Roughly speaking, I reckon a typical Jonjo runner is about a 6/4 chance to be trying and about 2/1 to be in a fit state to run to its form - so that's a 13/2 double you need to land before you even think about the horse actually beating the other ones.
His runners are simply impossible to weigh-up. At least with Barney Curley, there is a certain honesty about his dishonesty (if you know what I mean).
It is not uncommon for me to have a Jonjo horse on my private tissue at, say, 5/1, (with The Racing Post having something similar in their betting forecast too) only to look on Betfair in the morning and see that it is, for example, 17 to back and 800 to lay. What are punters supposed to make of that? Why does this sort of thing only happen on a regular basis to horses from his stable?
Anyway, if you want to read that thread, it is called "Is It Just Me...(part 2)". You can find it using the search feature on here. You may find it interesting.