REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

they might not hit their very best but to say they are going to run lengths slower when in fact both have won on it in the past is pushing it

Sundays race looks rock solid from a rating perspective..which is a compliment to G and PB..but it doesn't mean on fast ground they would pass Makfi.

when G and PB met at Ascot it was on fast ground and G beat PB a similar distance..odd coincidence then that they run to a similar level isn't it..ie the same horse rating wise

maybe its you that is overplaying the ground..one thing is for certain..all those people who made G odds on didn't see the ground as an issue.

What rating would G have got had she won by 2 lengths do you think?

[QUOTE="EC1, post: 2268017, member: 65360"] they might not hit their very best but to say they are going to run lengths slower when in fact both have won on it in the past is pushing it Sundays race looks rock solid from a rating perspective..which is a compliment to G and PB..but it doesn't mean on fast ground they would pass Makfi. when G and PB met at Ascot it was on fast ground and G beat PB a similar distance..odd coincidence then that they run to a similar level isn't it..ie the same horse rating wise maybe its you that is overplaying the ground..one thing is for certain..all those people who made G odds on didn't see the ground as an issue. What rating would G have got had she won by 2 lengths do you think? [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?