REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

The partion of Iraq absorbed by a Greater Syria/ Iran and Turkey presumedly. <_< The rewards for being in the axis of evil hey? Territorial gain, Natural resources and a Nuclear weapon. Bloody Libya must be kicking themselves

So we can't foresse the difficulties of Shi'ite Iran pushing its border onto Sunni Syria, somewhere across middle Iraq, and that's before we take on those Iraqis living in the wrong side, unless they're forceibly displaced or ethnically cleansed. Shades of Sudetenland me fear, as one side will eventually cross the border in support of their own etc So faced with a nuclear aspiring Iran, Syria will also proliferate in kind, whilst Israel sits back impassively? Me thinkz not, and in fairness I couldn't really blame them in this instance. Turkey? well they're a member of NATO, what ever that means these days, but the constituion allows them to invoke "a one for all and all for one" agreement. Which means that the US and UN will be back within a few years as peacekeepers.

Or could it be part of a cunning US master plan to propogate one big country called Muslimland, and so once all the various component countries have been neatly assembled, they can invade in one fell swoop and avoid fighting wars on 6 different fronts. h34r:

Or is it an increasingly desperate Bush tacitly recognising the folly of his misjudgement and seeking to compound it by trying to extricate himself with a really unworkable and ill conceived idea?

<blockquote data-quote="Warbler" data-source="post: 2089364" data-attributes="member: 65228">The partion of Iraq absorbed by a Greater Syria/ Iran and Turkey presumedly.&nbsp; &lt;_&lt;&nbsp; The rewards for being in the axis of evil hey? Territorial gain, Natural resources and a Nuclear weapon. Bloody Libya must be kicking themselvesSo we can&#039;t foresse the difficulties of Shi&#039;ite Iran pushing its border onto Sunni Syria, somewhere across middle Iraq, and that&#039;s before we take on those Iraqis living in the wrong side, unless they&#039;re forceibly displaced or ethnically cleansed. Shades of Sudetenland me fear, as one side will eventually cross the border in support of their own etc So faced with a nuclear aspiring Iran, Syria will also proliferate in kind, whilst Israel sits back impassively? Me thinkz not, and in fairness I couldn&#039;t really blame them in this instance. Turkey? well they&#039;re a member of NATO, what ever that means these days, but the constituion allows them to invoke &quot;a one for all and all for one&quot; agreement. Which means that the US and UN will be back within a few years as peacekeepers.Or could it be part of a cunning US master plan to propogate one big country called Muslimland, and so once all the various component countries have been neatly assembled, they can invade in one fell swoop and avoid fighting wars on 6 different fronts. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />h34r: Or is it an increasingly desperate Bush tacitly recognising the folly of his misjudgement and seeking to compound it by trying to extricate himself with a really unworkable and ill conceived idea?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Warbler, post: 2089364, member: 65228"] The partion of Iraq absorbed by a Greater Syria/ Iran and Turkey presumedly. <_< The rewards for being in the axis of evil hey? Territorial gain, Natural resources and a Nuclear weapon. Bloody Libya must be kicking themselves So we can't foresse the difficulties of Shi'ite Iran pushing its border onto Sunni Syria, somewhere across middle Iraq, and that's before we take on those Iraqis living in the wrong side, unless they're forceibly displaced or ethnically cleansed. Shades of Sudetenland me fear, as one side will eventually cross the border in support of their own etc So faced with a nuclear aspiring Iran, Syria will also proliferate in kind, whilst Israel sits back impassively? Me thinkz not, and in fairness I couldn't really blame them in this instance. Turkey? well they're a member of NATO, what ever that means these days, but the constituion allows them to invoke "a one for all and all for one" agreement. Which means that the US and UN will be back within a few years as peacekeepers. Or could it be part of a cunning US master plan to propogate one big country called Muslimland, and so once all the various component countries have been neatly assembled, they can invade in one fell swoop and avoid fighting wars on 6 different fronts. :ph34r: Or is it an increasingly desperate Bush tacitly recognising the folly of his misjudgement and seeking to compound it by trying to extricate himself with a really unworkable and ill conceived idea? [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?