Prince Harry

Aldaniti

At the Start
Joined
Dec 21, 2005
Messages
2,360
Location
Wickford
Just been watching a bit of the news this morning & why is it that its ok for everyone else's son to fight on the frontline but not him? seems a tad bit unfair :suspect:
 
I've not seen the news today but I can see the sense in keeping him out of harms way as much as possible. He's going to be a huge target for all kinds of weirdos. Imagine what could happen if he were captured and held hostage? Above all other soldiers, he's the man our enemies would like to either hold hostage or to kill so they can shout from the rooftops that they did it. So everybody around him is also at higher risk. It's not worth it.
 
It's a difficult one. Prince Harry, just by being in Iraq may well inflame the situation and may also put the men with him at greater risk. You can only imagine the political points that could be scored if Prince Harry was "taken out".

On the flipside, I can fully understand why Prince Harry wants to serve alongside his battalion. It's a difficult call but it wouldn't surprise me if Prince Harry gets his way in the end.
 
Some what surprisingly Kathy, that was the view I eventually came to. Much as though I wouldn't be adverse to sending the whole Royal family to serve in Iraq, I couldn't help thinking that if I were there, he'd be the very last person I would want to be standing next to. The problem of course is that in a war zone identifying him will not be very easy at all for any insurgent, who would probably need to rely on informants in order to specifically isolate his patrols (and it's not as if that's unheard of, gievn the joint patrols in operation and relaibility of some on the Iraqi side). That being the case, it could very easily spark an upsurge in such attacks as something akin to a 'numbers game' would be in operation. It was the Brighton bombers who famously remarked that the Government (you) "had to lucky every-time. We have to get lucky once". I can easily see much of the same rationale applying in this case.

Then of course you have to question the value of spending tax payers money to train someone for a duty, not mention the damage it will do to his own standing amongst those he's supposed to be leading. There's enough precedents in royal history, and I'd expect him to be assigned to recon brief studying the mating rituals of scorpions in the desert about 200 miles west of Basra surrounded by an SAS team
 
Originally posted by Colin Phillips@Apr 26 2007, 10:19 AM
With your connections, that could probably be described as "insider information"!!! :P :D
OY, Mr. Phillips.. I (almost) know where you live! :P
 
Why was he allowed to apply to Sandhurst, did the top officers not realise this was a possibility. And I agree with the question as to why it is ok for other people to go but not him. I am 36,789,312 in line to the throne, I should probably stay away too!!!!
 
Hasn't Prince Harry got police protection officers with him 24/7? Will they get forced onto the frontline too? Surely that wasn't in their job description!
 
Probably does his reputation no harm for it to be suggested that he was dragged out of active serving kicking and screaming...a nice leak, you could say

Just a thought
 
Originally posted by Euronymous@Apr 26 2007, 03:52 PM
Anyone noticed how much like James Hewitt Harry looks?
I have heard the joke that considering Harry is not related to james Hewitt it is ironic that he has also turned out to be an insufferable ginger tosser .
 
Odds against I'd say?

I tell you what :rolleyes: If I were assigned to drive a Scimitar around Basra in the next couple of months, I think I'd be putting in for vehicle upgrade to a Challenger, or even Scorp or bloody warrior despite it being less protected.

I'm increasingly thinking its both foolish, because it's not necessary, and it's only going to endanger further, people already doing a difficult (and ill-advised) job. I might nip down the pub that the local barracks use some time this week and find out what their opinion is on this one (God they love me in there :laughing: )
 
The troops' best bet is to dress in full black burqahs and learn to walk decorously, hiding their guns under their tentlike clothing. :ph34r:

"Where all the Breeteesh are these days, Ali?" shrug::

"I dunno, Hassan, but we got some mighty fine strong women in town now!" :luv:
 
Can't think of any other ginger men in the Royal Family who also look like Hewitt?
Best kept secret that one!!
 
Not in the royal family, but try to remember the Spencers - Diana's brother is distinctly ginger, and Harry most resembles him.
 
Just found this on my front page...


Quirkies: Harry's troops do a Spartacus

Soldiers are heading for Iraq wearing T-shirts saying "I'm Harry" in a show of support for Prince Harry.

The khaki tops also feature a telescopic sight target on the chest, reports the Daily Mirror.

The T-shirts echo the legendary scene of solidarity in epic movie Spartacus.

Militants have pledged to kill Prince Harry in Iraq and the T-shirts are intended as a humorous display of camaraderie.

A senior military source said: "Soldiers are well known for having operational tour T-shirts and also for pulling together to support each other.

"Prince Harry is highly respected by his comrades as a young officer and for what he is doing in the armed forces."

The £19.95 shirt is being sold on eBay and advertised under a rallying call of "I'm Spartacus, I'm Harry, we're all Harry now. Confuse the enemy, wear the T-shirt".

It is meant to copy a scene in the classic 1960 film Spartacus when Kirk Douglas's character is protected from Romans hunting him down after a battle.

Captured slaves are urged to hand over Spartacus for crucifixion - but instead they all stand up and say: "I'm Spartacus."


:clap: :laughing: :clap: :rolleyes:
 
No big surprise really. It does make you wonder what else he could do within his army career if combat is out of the question. Maybe a fireman for when Gilchrist calls his next strike.... can't think of much else, though.
 
Back
Top