• REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

    At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

i think a few people on here have made comments about what class of race CH would win next..that suggests to me that his rating is in question due to that line of thinking..its not putting words in mouths..no more than people saying i said that HF wasn't good enough ...just to run in the CH..which i didn't

 

i'm not being precious really..i just think that when any race has been rated up on here..not once has it been mentioned that a horse is unreliable due to what class it will win in next

 

its quite possible that a horse like CH can run many times without winning..but still be a good marker..the will to win is different from running to a level..I agree..he isn't a winner..but that doesn't stop him being a marker

 

it is just a case of jumping on my use of him I'm afraid..there are many horses used as markers that are like CH..but never once have i read that they aren't to be relied on because they don't win anymore

 

I don't mind being challenged about an opinion..but some of the replies on here have just been made to ridicule i'm afraid

 

i'm just returning the ridicule because the idea that a horse is only rated on what class of race it will win next ..is fookin ridiculous:)

 

i can take the ridicule..but people have to understand..that works both ways..if i read nonsense..i'll highlight it

 

seems fair to me


5 + 3 = ?
Back
Top