REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

I suspect he deliberately avoided the question.

I only saw the last 18 minutes but if they were representative of the whole shebang then it was a poor debate with a very poor host/umpire/chair whatever Campbell was.

Darling was very disappointing and made Salmond look good but the Yes people appeared to have got at their supporters before hand and urged them to cheer and clap his every utterance while the BG supporters were more reserved. The Yes supporters appeared, therefore, to outnumber substantially the No supporters and will have influenced the impression that Salmond did well.

It wasn't good viewing [based on that sample].

[QUOTE="Desert Orchid, post: 2469800, member: 65242"] I suspect he deliberately avoided the question. I only saw the last 18 minutes but if they were representative of the whole shebang then it was a poor debate with a very poor host/umpire/chair whatever Campbell was. Darling was very disappointing and made Salmond look good but the Yes people appeared to have got at their supporters before hand and urged them to cheer and clap his every utterance while the BG supporters were more reserved. The Yes supporters appeared, therefore, to outnumber substantially the No supporters and will have influenced the impression that Salmond did well. It wasn't good viewing [based on that sample]. [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?