REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

If there is a No vote, the Fat Man can be expected to try and boom-boom-shake-the-room, but he will be a loser in the eyes of all - not least those in his own party, who will seek to metaphorically plop his napper on a stick.

Nick Nack could easily be leading the Scottish Government early in the New Year.....and desperately hoping she can ride the storm until the new, federalist powers are established at Holyrood.

The stakes here are high.

A Yes vote is a high-risk leap into the unknown. A No vote secures additional autonomy. Fu*ck knows how Yes continues to punch-up high numbers, when there is no losing by voting the other way.

[QUOTE="Grasshopper, post: 2469912, member: 65342"] If there is a No vote, the Fat Man can be expected to try and boom-boom-shake-the-room, but he will be a loser in the eyes of all - not least those in his own party, who will seek to metaphorically plop his napper on a stick. Nick Nack could easily be leading the Scottish Government early in the New Year.....and desperately hoping she can ride the storm until the new, federalist powers are established at Holyrood. The stakes here are high. A Yes vote is a high-risk leap into the unknown. A No vote secures additional autonomy. Fu*ck knows how Yes continues to punch-up high numbers, when there is no losing by voting the other way. [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?