REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

Second part is probably true. First is frankly beyond belief. He may have been proved right, but at that time how on earth could he be certain that tehre wasnt one chemical/atomic/ germ weapon in the whole of iraq?

Maybe he could have asked the marsh arabs or the jurds for their view?

[QUOTE="clivex, post: 2096180, member: 65326"] Second part is probably true. First is frankly beyond belief. He may have been proved right, but at that time how on earth could he be certain that tehre wasnt one chemical/atomic/ germ weapon in the whole of iraq? Maybe he could have asked the marsh arabs or the jurds for their view? [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?