REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

these were the times I used to get a standard for Newmarket July 8f

Time/ best horse/ adjusted time to 90

97.98....80....97.32
98.40....89....98.33
98.85....86....98.59
99.73....75....98.74
98.74....91....98.81
99.50....80....98.84
99.44....82....98.91
100.13..74....99.07
99.99....79....99.26
100.05..80....99.39
100.73...70....99.41
99.62....94....99.88
100.88...77....100.02
100.39...85....100.06
100.37...88....100.24
99.90...104...100.82
101.11...86....100.85
101.69...79....100.96
101.55...85....101.22

the median is 99.40 for a 90 race

if you compare them to the RP standard there is quite a difference..even allowing for them using a 100 horse carrying 9-0...their standard is 96.50 which means on Good ground a 120 ish horse would need to run it in about 95 seconds..and yet the course record is only 95.53. Other courses at a mile differ from mine by about 2 seconds usually compared with RP ones..but this and Newmarket Rowley are really out imo. It would need to be really hard at Newmarket before Topspeed called it Good to firm with a standard like that

<blockquote data-quote="EC1" data-source="post: 2261171" data-attributes="member: 65360">these were the times I used to get a standard for Newmarket July 8fTime/ best horse/ adjusted time to 9097.98....80....97.3298.40....89....98.3398.85....86....98.5999.73....75....98.7498.74....91....98.8199.50....80....98.8499.44....82....98.91100.13..74....99.0799.99....79....99.26100.05..80....99.39100.73...70....99.4199.62....94....99.88100.88...77....100.02100.39...85....100.06100.37...88....100.2499.90...104...100.82101.11...86....100.85101.69...79....100.96101.55...85....101.22the median is 99.40 for a 90 race&nbsp;if you compare them to the RP standard there is quite a difference..even allowing for them using a 100 horse carrying 9-0...their standard is 96.50 which means on Good ground a 120 ish horse would need to run it in about 95 seconds..and yet the course record is only 95.53. Other courses at a mile differ from mine by about 2 seconds usually compared with RP ones..but this and Newmarket Rowley are really out imo.&nbsp; It would need to be really hard at Newmarket before Topspeed called it Good to firm with a standard like that</blockquote>

[QUOTE="EC1, post: 2261171, member: 65360"] these were the times I used to get a standard for [B]Newmarket July 8f[/B] Time/ best horse/ adjusted time to 90 97.98....80....97.32 98.40....89....98.33 98.85....86....98.59 99.73....75....98.74 98.74....91....98.81 99.50....80....98.84 99.44....82....98.91 100.13..74....99.07 99.99....79....99.26 100.05..80....99.39 100.73...70....99.41 99.62....94....99.88 100.88...77....100.02 100.39...85....100.06 100.37...88....100.24 99.90...104...100.82 101.11...86....100.85 101.69...79....100.96 101.55...85....101.22 the median is [B]99.40[/B] for a 90 race if you compare them to the RP standard there is quite a difference..even allowing for them using a 100 horse carrying 9-0...their standard is 96.50 which means on [B]Good[/B] ground a 120 ish horse would need to run it in about 95 seconds..and yet the course record is only 95.53. Other courses at a mile differ from mine by about 2 seconds usually compared with RP ones..but this and Newmarket Rowley are really out imo. It would need to be really hard at Newmarket before Topspeed called it Good to firm with a standard like that [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?