Stem Cell

clivex

Banned member
Joined
Jul 20, 2006
Messages
12,720
This is probably even bigger than his recent Iraq decision

Dare he put his religous fundamentalism before scientific progress?

I find it repugnant that the religous lobby are preventing valuable medical research (watch Ruth kelly here). They can have their beliefs but what right do they have to deprive the rest of us?

will Bush exercise his veto?



US House backs stem cell research

Opponents refuse to condone the destruction of any embryo
The US House of Representatives has passed a bill backing embryonic stem cell research, marking a major challenge to President George W Bush.
The stem cell bill was among the top priorities for the Democrats, who took control of Congress last week, but Mr Bush has vowed to veto it.

Advocates of stem cell research say it could lead to cures for diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.

Mr Bush says the research would destroy human life in the name of science.

The bill was passed by 253 to 174, but fell short of a two-thirds majority needed to overcome the veto.

"Today, by passing legislation to expand stem cell research, the House gave voice to the hopes of more than 100 million Americans and their families," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

"With today's strong bipartisan vote, we now challenge President Bush to join members from both sides of the aisle in supporting the hope of stem cell research."

Presidential veto

Mr Bush used his presidential veto to overturn a similar judgement by the Republican-controlled Congress last year.

It was the first time in his presidency that Mr Bush refused to sign into law a bill approved by Congress.

Polls suggest most Americans back the research.

Opponents of the bill say their taxes should not fund research which involves the destruction of embryos.

Its supporters maintain that the embryos used for research, that come from multiple embryos generated by couples trying to produce a pregnancy using in vitro fertilisation, would otherwise be discarded.
 
What's the Christian take on IVF, if it generates too many embryos, which must be destroyed? Surely one has to argue against that, for a start, if one believes that the destruction of any form of human life (from sperm onwards) is wrong? And then any form of sex outside marriage, not for the procreation of more humans, is wrong... :confused:

Cue "Every Sperm is Sacred" by Monty Python...
 
Back
Top