Still want less racing? Check the stats first

krizon

At the Start
Joined
May 2, 2003
Messages
16,263
Location
Dahn sarf
Along with assorted articles, tv pundits, forums, etc., there are occasional shouts from the benches on TH for less racing. Too many rubbish horses, far too much racing, the BHA must be mad, and so on. So I thought I'd get the stats from the Fixtures & Race Times Executive of the BHA: I phoned up, spoke to a charming and helpful young man, and here they are, for your consideration. The first figure is the number of races planned for 2009 followed by the percentage these take up in the year's full fixtures list.

Group 1 (Pattern and Listed): 296/4.87%

Group 2: 336/5.53%

Group 3: 416/6.85%

Group 4: 1236/20.36%

Group 5: 2151/35.42%

Group 6: 1607/26.47%

Group 7: 30/0.49%

Total number of races: 6072

Not too difficult to see that if you pulled the 'rubbish' Class 5 and 6 racing, apart from a number of low-level courses closing completely, you'd lose some 62% of British racing.

I can understand that people feel there's too much racing, although the answer to that is very simple: don't bother to watch it, don't consider it for betting. But, of course, people never do the simple thing. They watch it and moan about it. They regularly bet on it, and moan about it. So perhaps you'd moan-no-more if it were removed, and you had to concentrate on the remaining smaller percentage of much higher-rated handicappers and top horses (which, as we know, tend not to hang around past the age of three), which, if the moaners are to believed, represent a 'really tricky' betting medium?

I wonder if the moaning isn't just part of the British psyche, its 'whinging Pom' attitude which the Australians love to berate us about. Because if we lost the low class racing which so many apparently love to hate, we'd be faced with some very severe tests of selecting ability, with longeurs between race meetings and much smaller fields, and far tighter SPs.

If punters, who espouse themselves as the bedrock on which racing exists, and without whom racing could not survive, really are that essential to racing, then it would appear it's a necessity to support those 5s and 6s. We know that punters do, of course, whining and moaning as they hand over their Tote Trifectas or £10 on-the-noses, but I'm sure that if one offered to wipe out the 60%+ of their daily gambling opportunities, they'd be moaning that their supposed wish to see it disappear had come true.
 
Last edited:
Remove around 850 races from Class 5 and 400 races from Class 6, leaving Class 4, 5 and 6 still making up ~25% each of the total, with 20% less races overall.

What do I win?
 
You can choose from a cuddly toy, a food mixer, or a day for two at Legoland, Gareth. Let me know which you'd like by PM this evening.
 
If extra races were bringing in commensurate revenue then I'd have no problem, but they aren't. The idea that punters keep betting in them is only true in that races are being homogenised as a punting medium with actual spend merely spread out and most punters having less and less genuine interest in the product as a sport.
 
Back
Top