Terrible State Of The Nhs

Shadow Leader

At the Start
Joined
Nov 9, 2003
Messages
9,884
I find it so very hard to believe that Labour are claiming to have the NHS in the best state it's been in for years. It makes my blood boil. I am so angry - my grandfather has been having chest pains & pains in his legs to the extent that he has been very ill for a month or so & it hurts him to even walk. He had a quadruple by-pass about 10-15 years ago too so he has a history of heart problems. He went to see his doctor who referred him to a cardiologist for a scan. They made him wait nearly three weeks for the results of the scan which showed that he has an aortic aneurysm with a width of 4.9cm & needs an operation to remove it. Here's the really good bit - the earliest he can have the operation is in 17 weeks time. :angy: :angy: How the hell can they be allowed to get away with this? My aunt lives in Australia & she was furious; she went to see her GP who said that if an aneurysm was larger than 4.5cm it would be considered an urgent case & they would operate immediately. How can it be so different in the UK? How can they play with people's lives like that? For Christ's sake, this is a serious condition & one which is unstable; it could rupture or enlarge at any time & place my grandpa in serious danger. This has made me really angry. Luckily, my grandparents have some savings so they are going to have the operation done privately (although the likely cost of the op could be as much as £30k) but what about those people who can't afford to do this?
 
Our health service is in a parlous state compared with many other advanced nations - and I for one would be prepared to pay more in tax if I could be guaranted that it would improve as a result. Having said that, and I'm aware that there is little consolation for your grandparents here, there is no conflict between the delay that he has been quoted and the statement that the health service is in the best condition that it's been in for years. Ten years ago in certain parts of the country - and there are still regional variances, it must be stressed - the wait for similar operations to that which your grandfather is in need was more than one year!
 
That is ridiculous, a year's wait! It's selfish, I know, but it really brings it home when it's a member of your family that is ill & needs surgery that they have to wait far too long for.
 
Don't get me started about the bloody National Health "service".

It's a disgrace - my local health authority managed to get a massive "no stars" in its recent assessment. And those in charge haven't been sacked or had the decency to resign.

I know of family mambers and friends who've had the most appalling "treatment", in filthy wards, with shit and vomit (moist and dried available) all over the place, and seemingly half the staff unable to understand or speak English properly, never mind MRSA as well. Accident and emergency - insane waiting times, I know someone who went in on a Monday with a broken wrist and didn't get treated until the Wednesday.
 
Jeez lads you have little to complain about. You'd want to see it here. The ex Minister for Health described his department as 'Angola'
 
Thanks for the education ;) :lol:

A mate of mine went in for an opp, he caught the super bug, Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus M.R.S.A for the un-initaited and died because of it a brilliant guy too.

Caused through filth lack of hygene among other things.............. :angry:
 
What is MRSA?

The organism Staphylococcus aureus is found on many individuals skin and seems to cause no major problems. However if it gets inside the body, for instance under the skin or into the lungs, it can cause important infections such as boils or pneumonia. Individuals who carry this organism are usually totally healthy, have no problems whatever and are considered simply to be carriers of the organism.

The term MRSA or methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus is used to describe those examples of this organism that are resistant to commonly used antibiotics. Methicillin was an antibiotic used many years ago to treat patients with Staphylococcus aureus infections. It is now no longer used except as a means of identifying this particular type of antibiotic resistance.

Individuals can become carriers of MRSA in the same way that they can become a carrier of ordinary Staphylococcus aureus which is by physical contact with the organism. If the organism is on the skin then it can be passed around by physical contact. If the organism is in the nose or is associated with the lungs rather than the skin then it may be passed around by droplet spread from the mouth and nose. We can find out if and where Staphylococcus aureus is located on a patient by taking various samples, sending them to the laboratory and growing the organism. Tests done on any Staphylococcus aureus grown from such specimens can then decide how sensitive the organisms is to antibiotics and if it is a methicillin resistant (MRSA) organism. These test usually take 2-3 days.


Why bother with MRSA?

MRSA organisms are often associated with patients in hospitals but can also be found on patients not in a hospital. Usually it is not necessary to do anything about MRSA organisms. However if MRSA organisms are passed on to someone who is already ill, then a more serious infection may occur in that individual. When patients with MRSA are discovered in a hospital, the hospital will usually try to prevent it from passing around to other patients. This is known as infection control.


How do we prevent the spread of MRSA?

Measures to prevent the spread of organisms from one person to another are called isolation or infection control. The type of infection control or isolation required for any patient depends on the organism, where the organisms is found on an individual and the patient.

The most important type of isolation required for MRSA is what is called Contact Isolation. This type of isolation requires everyone in contact with the patient to be very careful about hand washing after touching either the patient or anything in contact with the patient. If the organism is in the nose or lungs it may also be necessary to have the patient in a room to prevent spread to others by droplet spread. Because dust and surfaces can become contaminated with the organism, cleaning of surfaces are also important. This usually occurs after the patient leaves the hospital.

If a number of patients are infected with the same organism it is possible to nurse them in the same area. On occasions for the sake of other patients it may be necessary to move carriers of MRSA to an isolation unit such as ours which specializes in isolating all types of infections to protect other persons. The medical care of such patients will continue in an isolation unit which are well used to caring for all types of medical and surgical problems associated with infections.


What do visitors need to do?

Provided relatives and friends of patients with MRSA are healthy there is no restriction on visiting and it carries no risk. Visitors are not required to wear special clothing BUT we would ask you to help us prevent this organism spreading around our hospital by keeping the patients' door closed at all times and always washing your hands whenever you leave the room.


What about MRSA at home?

In patients who are otherwise well the organisms often disappear once the patient leaves the hospital. Sometimes they do not however, and this may mean that when a patient has to go back into hospital the isolation precautions need to be used again. Provided everyone at home is healthy special precautions are not required at home.


What can be done about MRSA?

In certain situations it may be a good idea to try to get rid of the organism from a patient and this can be done with various creams and shampoos or on occasions combinations of antibiotics taken by mouth or by injection depending on the health of the patient.
 
Back
Top