I'll tell you what is much more of a worry. Never mind Osama bin Laden, Kim Jong Il or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - George Bush is the most dangerous man in the world. And before the usual suspects jump to his defence I'll explain my reasoning. Bush has at his disposal unlimited resources and influence. As he has no policy at all other than that which is dictated to him by the neo-con treligious right (ban stem-cell research, online gambling etc) and the big corporations that back him (remember Kenny-boy?) these are either unused or misused.
This may cause you to take longer to get to sleep than usual. In response to Israel's reoccupation of Gaza and bombing of Lebanon Condoleza Rice urged restraint on Jerusalem. Her boss, the leader of the free world offered his support instead.
The exacerbation of the Middle East problems has come about since the US administration's abandonment of the peace process which their country had been so instrumental in starting.
On Iraq Bush makes speeches about "victory" and "defeat of the enemy" at the same time as his generals are telling him hat a political solution is the only solution as all-out civil war is on the horizon.
Peter Galbraith was a US Senate insider for many years and as such was involved in diplomacy with Iraq. In his book "The End Of Iraq: How American IncompetenceCreated A War without End" he tells, and attributes to specific sources, a highly worrying story. In January 2003 George Bush met three prominent Iraqi dissidentswho during he course of discussing the future of post-war Iraq talked about Sunnis and Shi'ites. It quickly became apparent to them that the president was totally unfamiliar with the terms.
While Bush was president-elect Bill Clinton's national security team Had a treaty with North Korea. Bush's future secretary of state, Colin Powell, was enthusiastic about the plans. When his mentors advised him to sever all links with the Clinton administration Bush pulled the plug on all diplomacy with North Korea, in the process humiliating Powell and South Korean president Kim Dae-Jung. North Korea reacted predictably with outrageous violations. The US negotiator, Charles Pritchard, was constantly subverted by the then under-secretary of state, John Bolton (later laughably made US Ambasador to the United Nations, an organisation for which he had always expressed contempt).
Bush noe refuses to talk to North Korea and his only "policy" is to kowtow to China in the hope that it will persuade Kim Jong Ilagainst developing his nuclear weapons. But it is the Chinese who have declared that they will veto any US initiated sanctions in the Un council.
Ex US-negotiator Pritchard wrote in the Washington Post last month: By not talking with North Korea we are failing to address missiles, human rights, illegal activities, conventinal forces, weapons of mass destruction, terrorism and anything else that matters to the American people. Isn't it about time we actually tried to solve the problem rather than let it fester until we blow it up?"