REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

I have a bit more checking and tweaking to do but this is where my figures stand at the moment (the higher-rated ones).

(Edit - ignore the 'form' and 'days' columns, the card is the one I created the day the weights came out.)

Alongside these I tend to do another set of ratings with the adjustment of 1½ per pound to account the extremeness of this test, especially if it is very soft, and the effect of carrying weight. The stronger the pace the more likely this second set of ratings is to end up more accurate. I haven't done them yet but it's easy enough to look at the classier lightweights and see which are more likely to be favoured.

[ATTACH=full]24039[/ATTACH]

[QUOTE="Desert Orchid, post: 2696683, member: 65242"] I have a bit more checking and tweaking to do but this is where my figures stand at the moment (the higher-rated ones). (Edit - ignore the 'form' and 'days' columns, the card is the one I created the day the weights came out.) Alongside these I tend to do another set of ratings with the adjustment of 1½ per pound to account the extremeness of this test, especially if it is very soft, and the effect of carrying weight. The stronger the pace the more likely this second set of ratings is to end up more accurate. I haven't done them yet but it's easy enough to look at the classier lightweights and see which are more likely to be favoured. [ATTACH type="full" alt="Screenshot (194).png"]24039[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?