REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

Well there is a lot there.

Firstly I travel se trains sometimes out of rush hour and they are excellent. No problems at all

eush hour crushes are down to the booming economy. Which you don't believe exists of course. The jubilee line has one eight carriage train a minute in rush hours and is still packed eastbound in the morning. What more can be done? We need new lines but taht takes years

as for fares, the if the government subsidies, you stil pay. Isn't that obvious?

eats coast is good I know but so are othe recent privatised services such as hull trains and the one that goes to Sunderland which got top ratings .

To be hinest I'm not against a national rail service but I do not for one minute belueve that the problems are down to privatisation. Or should I say the operators. Long term investment has been sorely lacking but no one will convince me that it was better before. I am a heavy user of trains and will tell it as I find it.

<blockquote data-quote="clivex" data-source="post: 2518748" data-attributes="member: 65326">Well there is a lot there. Firstly I travel se trains sometimes out of rush hour and they are excellent. No problems at alleush hour crushes are down to the booming economy. Which you don&#039;t believe exists of course. The jubilee line has one eight carriage train a minute in rush hours and is still packed eastbound in the morning. What more can be done? We need new lines but taht takes yearsas for fares, the if the government subsidies, you stil pay. Isn&#039;t that obvious?eats coast is good I know but so are othe recent privatised services such as hull trains and the one that goes to Sunderland which got top ratings . To be hinest I&#039;m not against a national rail service but I do not for one minute belueve that the problems are down to privatisation. Or should I say the operators. Long term investment has been sorely lacking but no one will convince me that it was better before. I am a heavy user of trains and will tell it as I find it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="clivex, post: 2518748, member: 65326"] Well there is a lot there. Firstly I travel se trains sometimes out of rush hour and they are excellent. No problems at all eush hour crushes are down to the booming economy. Which you don't believe exists of course. The jubilee line has one eight carriage train a minute in rush hours and is still packed eastbound in the morning. What more can be done? We need new lines but taht takes years as for fares, the if the government subsidies, you stil pay. Isn't that obvious? eats coast is good I know but so are othe recent privatised services such as hull trains and the one that goes to Sunderland which got top ratings . To be hinest I'm not against a national rail service but I do not for one minute belueve that the problems are down to privatisation. Or should I say the operators. Long term investment has been sorely lacking but no one will convince me that it was better before. I am a heavy user of trains and will tell it as I find it. [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?