REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

Frankly ec you are out of your depth and an embarrassment . Don't tell me I'm talking nonsense when you can't even lift yourself to google basic information or even have the slightest understanding of the difference between an appreciating asset and a cost

not taking on board the index benny highlighted is akin to arguing that inflation was 2% in the seventies and 25% now rather than the stated figures. It's based in near enough the same criteria ffs

the gap I prosperity now and then is so massive that it's not even a marginal argument.
it is also worth adding that the index does not include the accumulated assets which again puts further huge spacebetween now and the seventies

[QUOTE="clivex, post: 2518772, member: 65326"] Frankly ec you are out of your depth and an embarrassment . Don't tell me I'm talking nonsense when you can't even lift yourself to google basic information or even have the slightest understanding of the difference between an appreciating asset and a cost not taking on board the index benny highlighted is akin to arguing that inflation was 2% in the seventies and 25% now rather than the stated figures. It's based in near enough the same criteria ffs the gap I prosperity now and then is so massive that it's not even a marginal argument. it is also worth adding that the index does not include the accumulated assets which again puts further huge spacebetween now and the seventies [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?