REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

I like one stats because they are the real facts . Jesus . This is desperate. You need a stat to prove How wealth is distributed to prove something otherwise and the fact that disposable income has multiplied so much in real terms would simply trump that massively. Anyone can see that

you don't need to go into detail to understand that very fact. Its not increased by 20% it's increased by 250% for chrissake

and that is before we get into increase in net assets which I bet has grown by an even larger real multiple given how property has rocketed in value in that period

quoting the top 1% is barmy. It's doesn't mean for one second that the remainders wealth hasn't grown because theirs has. It is entirely 100% irrelevant

its like saying that if you get a 10% payrise and neighbour gets 15% you are poorer. Socialist thinking and ludicrous . The politics of envy

<blockquote data-quote="clivex" data-source="post: 2518798" data-attributes="member: 65326">I like one stats because they are the real facts . Jesus . This is desperate. You need a stat to prove How wealth is distributed to prove something otherwise and the fact that disposable income has multiplied so much in real terms would simply trump that massively. Anyone can see thatyou don&#039;t need to go into detail to understand that very fact. Its not increased by 20% it&#039;s increased by 250% for chrissake and that is before we get into increase in net assets which I bet has grown by an even larger real multiple given how property has rocketed in value in that periodquoting the top 1% is barmy. It&#039;s doesn&#039;t mean for one second that the remainders wealth hasn&#039;t grown because theirs has. It is entirely 100% irrelevantits like saying that if you get a 10% payrise and neighbour gets 15% you are poorer.&nbsp; Socialist thinking and ludicrous . The politics of envy</blockquote>

[QUOTE="clivex, post: 2518798, member: 65326"] I like one stats because they are the real facts . Jesus . This is desperate. You need a stat to prove How wealth is distributed to prove something otherwise and the fact that disposable income has multiplied so much in real terms would simply trump that massively. Anyone can see that you don't need to go into detail to understand that very fact. Its not increased by 20% it's increased by 250% for chrissake and that is before we get into increase in net assets which I bet has grown by an even larger real multiple given how property has rocketed in value in that period quoting the top 1% is barmy. It's doesn't mean for one second that the remainders wealth hasn't grown because theirs has. It is entirely 100% irrelevant its like saying that if you get a 10% payrise and neighbour gets 15% you are poorer. Socialist thinking and ludicrous . The politics of envy [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?