REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

average house in 1971..£5600..was a bit better than sharing a bathroom with someone Grass..thats not accurate one little bit..in 1968 our house was 5 year old..decent sized.. newish house..semi ..£3600..we didn't share a bathroom You could have got that easily on an average wage in 71

i'm not arguing life expectancy/health care..i'm talking about real life circumstances re money in and out.

you yourself have said that 2011 man must now live with mum and dad and not bother with his own home to have some money to spend..because unlike his.."worse off" financially 1971 counterpart..he can't afford his own home. That in itself tells you whether people are better off financially these days...he has no home of his own is the trade off for having spendo..super eh?

i have provided clear evidence that a man is worse off financially..and you have proved it..you have taken his home away..just so he has some money left so he can compete with 1971 man

thats his home..not a mars bar..or a weeks shopping..or a gas bill...his home..just so you can say he has more disposable income..well lucky old 2011 man

<blockquote data-quote="EC1" data-source="post: 2518920" data-attributes="member: 65360">average house in 1971..£5600..was a bit better than sharing a bathroom with someone Grass..thats not accurate one little bit..in 1968 our house was 5 year old..decent sized.. newish house..semi ..£3600..we didn&#039;t share a bathroom<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> You could have got that easily on an average wage in 71i&#039;m not arguing life expectancy/health care..i&#039;m talking about real life circumstances re money in and out.you yourself have said that 2011 man must now live with mum and dad and not bother with his own home to have some money to spend..because unlike his..&quot;worse off&quot; financially 1971 counterpart..he can&#039;t afford his own home. That in itself tells you whether people are better off financially these days...he has no home of his own is the trade off for having spendo..super eh?i have provided clear evidence that a man is worse off financially..and you have proved it..you have taken his home away..just so he has some money left so he can compete with 1971 manthats his home..not a mars bar..or a weeks shopping..or a gas bill...his home..just so you can say he has more disposable income..well lucky old 2011 man</blockquote>

[QUOTE="EC1, post: 2518920, member: 65360"] average house in 1971..£5600..was a bit better than sharing a bathroom with someone Grass..thats not accurate one little bit..in 1968 our house was 5 year old..decent sized.. newish house..semi ..£3600..we didn't share a bathroom:) You could have got that easily on an average wage in 71 i'm not arguing life expectancy/health care..i'm talking about real life circumstances re money in and out. you yourself have said that 2011 man must now live with mum and dad and not bother with his own home to have some money to spend..because unlike his.."worse off" financially 1971 counterpart..he can't afford his own home. That in itself tells you whether people are better off financially these days...he has no home of his own is the trade off for having spendo..super eh? i have provided clear evidence that a man is worse off financially..and you have proved it..you have taken his home away..just so he has some money left so he can compete with 1971 man thats his home..not a mars bar..or a weeks shopping..or a gas bill...his home..just so you can say he has more disposable income..well lucky old 2011 man [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?