REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

Arthur, Ideology is for students, wafflers and tall, thin, Eurocrats . I deal in the day-to-day practicalities of existence.

If it was a good thing for property not to accrue in value, it surely would have happened by now. My belief is that a price-cap/jerrymandered-limit would benefit the few at the expense of the many, as I stated in an earlier post......the one which tried to weigh-up the pros-and-cons, rather than indulge in navel-gazing "what ifs", but which appears to have been conveniently ignored for the purposes of your own post above.

I also see the 2008 crash for what it was - an anomaly, that is a bad place to legislate from.

Beyond that, I generally don't have anything more to add to this discussion, other than to state that I'm naturally horrified to be on the same side of the debate as our hero from Richmond.....but in this single case, I believe he is correct (though an admittedly a horrible, rude, cu*nt whilst he goes about being right.

<blockquote data-quote="Grasshopper" data-source="post: 2519003" data-attributes="member: 65342">Arthur, Ideology is for students, wafflers and tall, thin, Eurocrats <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="😜" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61c.png" title="Winking face with tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:" data-shortname=":stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />. I deal in the day-to-day practicalities of existence.If it was a good thing for property not to accrue in value, it surely would have happened by now. My belief is that a price-cap/jerrymandered-limit would benefit the few at the expense of the many, as I stated in an earlier post......the one which tried to weigh-up the pros-and-cons, rather than indulge in navel-gazing &quot;what ifs&quot;, but which appears to have been conveniently ignored for the purposes of your own post above.I also see the 2008 crash for what it was - an anomaly, that is a bad place to legislate from.Beyond that, I generally don&#039;t have anything more to add to this discussion, other than to state that I&#039;m naturally horrified to be on the same side of the debate as our hero from Richmond.....but in this single case, I believe he is correct (though an admittedly a horrible, rude, cu*nt whilst he goes about being right. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="😎" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" title="Smiling face with sunglasses&nbsp; &nbsp; :sunglasses:" data-shortname=":sunglasses:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Grasshopper, post: 2519003, member: 65342"] Arthur, Ideology is for students, wafflers and tall, thin, Eurocrats 😜. I deal in the day-to-day practicalities of existence. If it was a good thing for property not to accrue in value, it surely would have happened by now. My belief is that a price-cap/jerrymandered-limit would benefit the few at the expense of the many, as I stated in an earlier post......the one which tried to weigh-up the pros-and-cons, rather than indulge in navel-gazing "what ifs", but which appears to have been conveniently ignored for the purposes of your own post above. I also see the 2008 crash for what it was - an anomaly, that is a bad place to legislate from. Beyond that, I generally don't have anything more to add to this discussion, other than to state that I'm naturally horrified to be on the same side of the debate as our hero from Richmond.....but in this single case, I believe he is correct (though an admittedly a horrible, rude, cu*nt whilst he goes about being right. 😎 [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?