Leamington's probably better, but to be honest it reads like a roll call for the dispossed
Soke, Wolverhampton, Walsall, Dudley, Coventry, Northampton, Derby, Leicester et al
Nottingham has merit i believe.
The Midlands is a strange region though. It's devoid of characteristics and as such is probably a victim of its sense of central compromise. There's little distinguishing about it, nothing that announces you're approaching it, nor leaving it. The scenary doesn't change, neither does the local built environment. Its a bit of a crossroads you seem to unavoidably have to travel through, invariably on the way to somewhere else. It has little by way of disticnt identity. It's cities are functional rather than charismatic, its people similarly, are neither one thing or another. It's not without its regional tensions, but I'm not as convinced they're as ingrained as they are in the Midlands, as they are elsewhere. It's never really generated any 'populist' movement that I can immediately think of, it's basically there. It's contribution however, by way of the cradle of the industrial revolution, has gone around the globe.
I tended to regard it as something of a globule of a region. It's borders seem particularly undefined and maluable depending on prevailing circumstances. It's sense of identity is also amorphic. I've never really been able to put my finger on it. Where does it start? where does it finish?
Are Derby and Nottingham Midlands cities?. Is Lincoln a Midlands cathedral? Is Cheltenham in the Midlands? or is it in the West Country? Oxford for that matter? Peterborugh and Ludlow? I've heard them all adopted and denied at various times