REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

Yes I did. I'm usually happy to embrace new sponsors' names with the big races but I'm avoiding using the current sponsors' name or initials as my own petty, personal boycott. Maybe if they ever cough up on my winning bet, I'll change.

However, I had Hold 'Em well up my ratings for that race (but not with the scope for improvement the right 'profile' horse would have) and I don't think he ran to form last week.

Going back to the quoted text. I don't usually mix them up. I remember the order they took place in terms of 'Mac'(keson) being before 'Mas'(sey-Ferguson) in alphabetical order.

[QUOTE="Desert Orchid, post: 2223942, member: 65242"] Yes I did. I'm usually happy to embrace new sponsors' names with the big races but I'm avoiding using the current sponsors' name or initials as my own petty, personal boycott. Maybe if they ever cough up on my winning bet, I'll change. However, I had Hold 'Em well up my ratings for that race (but not with the scope for improvement the right 'profile' horse would have) and I don't think he ran to form last week. Going back to the quoted text. I don't usually mix them up. I remember the order they took place in terms of 'Mac'(keson) being before 'Mas'(sey-Ferguson) in alphabetical order. [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?