REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

the nutrition argument isn't relevant imo..taken to its extreme..in a 100 years a selling plater could beat a G1 horse with improvements in nutrition etc.

Why is it hard to believe the 2nd best horse came from the same stable?..hasn't Nicholls had the 3 highest rated horses over the last 20 years in his stable at the same time

Flyingbolt was also a bit of a freak..maybe they were giving out freak tablets in the yard

i've asked it before..no answer..if KS beat Denman 30 lengths with the rest strung out confirming Denman ran to form..what rating would you give KS???

it would be similar to Arkle's...he gave good horses proper hammerings..a bit like KS's best KG wins..but done nearly every race

thats not pulling KS down..he is the best chaser since Arkle...when we get another Arkle..then that one will be equal or better than Arkle..just forget Arkle..you won't see another one..and appreciate what we have got really is the answer..why pull horses down because its a long time ago and i want my generation horses to be better than other generations ones.?

<blockquote data-quote="EC1" data-source="post: 2368466" data-attributes="member: 65360">the nutrition argument isn&#039;t relevant imo..taken to its extreme..in a 100 years a selling plater could beat a G1 horse with improvements in nutrition etc.&nbsp;Why is it hard to believe the 2nd best horse came from the same stable?..hasn&#039;t Nicholls had the 3 highest rated horses over the last 20 years in his stable at the same time&nbsp;Flyingbolt was also a bit of a freak..maybe they were giving out freak tablets in the yard<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />&nbsp;i&#039;ve asked it before..no answer..if KS beat Denman 30 lengths with the rest strung out confirming Denman ran to form..what rating would you give KS???&nbsp;it would be similar to Arkle&#039;s...he gave good horses proper hammerings..a bit like KS&#039;s best KG wins..but done nearly every race&nbsp;thats not pulling KS down..he is the best chaser since Arkle...when we get another Arkle..then that one will be equal or better than Arkle..just forget Arkle..you won&#039;t see another one..and appreciate what we have got really is the answer..why pull horses down because its a long time ago and i want my generation horses to be better than other generations ones.?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="EC1, post: 2368466, member: 65360"] the nutrition argument isn't relevant imo..taken to its extreme..in a 100 years a selling plater could beat a G1 horse with improvements in nutrition etc. Why is it hard to believe the 2nd best horse came from the same stable?..hasn't Nicholls had the 3 highest rated horses over the last 20 years in his stable at the same time Flyingbolt was also a bit of a freak..maybe they were giving out freak tablets in the yard;) i've asked it before..no answer..[B]if KS beat Denman 30 lengths with the rest strung out confirming Denman ran to form[/B]..[B]what rating would you give KS???[/B] it would be similar to Arkle's...he gave good horses proper hammerings..a bit like KS's best KG wins..but done nearly every race thats not pulling KS down..he is the best chaser since Arkle...when we get another Arkle..then that one will be equal or better than Arkle..just forget Arkle..you won't see another one..and appreciate what we have got really is the answer..why pull horses down because its a long time ago and i want my generation horses to be better than other generations ones.? [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?