Reply to thread

Interesting stuff. My own gut feeling is that most Americans have made their mind up about Hillary and as I've said before, she's a deeply polarising person with few shades of grey. The article half confirms that, but then somewhat contradictorarily goes on to suggest that he approval ratings have oscilated wildly before, which would of course give the lie to my assertion that she's got less scope than most given that people tend to hold reasonably intransigent position about her.

I didn't realise how well Rudy was fairing   As I've also said before Giuliani versus Clinton would be the dirtiest election in history. I was actually more interested in the Senate election than the Presidential in 2000, for such time as these two were on a collision course. I apologise if it sounds pompous (well it does, so I'm sorry) but I think you need to have spent a bit of time in New York observing the Mayor's modus operandi to get an insight into this potential clash of titans. (I do believe it's on that scale). Rudy is truly ruthless, and Hillary's not above pulling the odd dirty stunt either. Had they clashed in New York, then there would probably be no chance they could face off in a Presidential election, as the loser wouldn't get selected. Now it seems we have a fair chance of this spectacle being played out globally.

My own best guess is that Guiliani would beat her in a long haul, and to some extent taking the VC price on him, is not bad saver rather than backing her. I personally feel the Republicans will come to realise that he's their best 'stop Clinton' candidate and will select him specifically for that purpose. So if you're of the opinion that Hillary wins the nomination, then the smart bet would be to back Rudy for both the Republican candidate and the White House I think.