REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

Edwards is the value isn't he? in fact it's blindingly obvious. Rarely have I seen a more contradictory market in any betting heat though, I reckon at various times over the last few months you could have covered half the field and still be showing a healthy book.

I've taken the following from 'adherents.com' (don't ask I don't know )

Denomination Number of
Presidents

Episcopalian 11
Presbyterian 10
Methodist 5
Baptist 4
Unitarian 4
Disciples of Christ 3
Dutch Reformed 2
Quaker 2
Congregationalist 2
Catholic 1
Jehovah's Witness 1

TOTAL 42

I can't account for the missing one, but it doesn't look good for Romney. I always thought the American public was more inclined to tarring and feathering mormons before they vote them into the oval office. It doesn't look good for Giuliani either. The only previous catholic was shot dead. No blacks, no women. You can wipe over half the field out on stats. I'm curious to know who the Jehovah's witness is/ was?

<blockquote data-quote="Warbler" data-source="post: 2099564" data-attributes="member: 65228">Edwards is the value isn&#039;t he? in fact it&#039;s blindingly obvious. Rarely have I seen a more contradictory market in any betting heat though, I reckon at various times over the last few months you could have covered half the field and still be showing a healthy book.I&#039;ve taken the following from &#039;adherents.com&#039; (don&#039;t ask I don&#039;t know <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> )Denomination Number ofPresidents Episcopalian 11 Presbyterian 10 Methodist 5 Baptist 4 Unitarian 4&nbsp; Disciples of Christ 3&nbsp; Dutch Reformed 2&nbsp; Quaker 2&nbsp; Congregationalist 2&nbsp; Catholic 1&nbsp; Jehovah&#039;s Witness 1&nbsp; TOTAL 42 I can&#039;t account for the missing one, but it doesn&#039;t look good for Romney. I always thought the American public was more inclined to tarring and feathering mormons before they vote them into the oval office. It doesn&#039;t look good for Giuliani either. The only previous catholic was shot dead. No blacks, no women. You can wipe over half the field out on stats. I&#039;m curious to know who the Jehovah&#039;s witness is/ was?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Warbler, post: 2099564, member: 65228"] Edwards is the value isn't he? in fact it's blindingly obvious. Rarely have I seen a more contradictory market in any betting heat though, I reckon at various times over the last few months you could have covered half the field and still be showing a healthy book. I've taken the following from 'adherents.com' (don't ask I don't know :D ) Denomination Number of Presidents Episcopalian 11 Presbyterian 10 Methodist 5 Baptist 4 Unitarian 4 Disciples of Christ 3 Dutch Reformed 2 Quaker 2 Congregationalist 2 Catholic 1 Jehovah's Witness 1 TOTAL 42 I can't account for the missing one, but it doesn't look good for Romney. I always thought the American public was more inclined to tarring and feathering mormons before they vote them into the oval office. It doesn't look good for Giuliani either. The only previous catholic was shot dead. No blacks, no women. You can wipe over half the field out on stats. I'm curious to know who the Jehovah's witness is/ was? [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?