REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

From today's Observer, Ruddy Rudy the next President - God knows what he'd do? Much as though he'd be could value for a run, the prospect of him winning the Oval office wasn't really something I could contemplate. In Warbler's theatre of politics I'd love to see him as a candidate, but as a President The last para is the one I've got my hopes pinned on, as they've come to the same conclusion as me, (withone important difference). I've obviously gambled on the idea that the Democrats will conclude in the longer term that Rudy would beat either of their two front runners, and thus switch to Edwards. The oBserver has gone slightly the other way, and decided that Rudy would also beat Obama or Clinton, but that the Democrats won't realise that in time.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/7days/story...2165267,00.html

<blockquote data-quote="Warbler" data-source="post: 2099576" data-attributes="member: 65228">From today&#039;s Observer, Ruddy Rudy the next President - God knows what he&#039;d do? Much as though he&#039;d be could value for a run, the prospect of him winning the Oval office wasn&#039;t really something I could contemplate. In Warbler&#039;s theatre of politics I&#039;d love to see him as a candidate, but as a President <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":eek:" title="Eek!&nbsp; &nbsp; :eek:"&nbsp; data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":eek:" />&nbsp; The last para is the one I&#039;ve got my hopes pinned on, as they&#039;ve come to the same conclusion as me, (withone important difference). I&#039;ve obviously gambled on the idea that the Democrats will conclude in the longer term that Rudy would beat either of their two front runners, and thus switch to Edwards. The oBserver has gone slightly the other way, and decided that Rudy would also beat Obama or Clinton, but that the Democrats won&#039;t realise that in time.<a href="http://observer.guardian.co.uk/7days/story/0,,2165267,00.html" target="_blank">http://observer.guardian.co.uk/7days/story...2165267,00.html</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Warbler, post: 2099576, member: 65228"] From today's Observer, Ruddy Rudy the next President - God knows what he'd do? Much as though he'd be could value for a run, the prospect of him winning the Oval office wasn't really something I could contemplate. In Warbler's theatre of politics I'd love to see him as a candidate, but as a President :eek: The last para is the one I've got my hopes pinned on, as they've come to the same conclusion as me, (withone important difference). I've obviously gambled on the idea that the Democrats will conclude in the longer term that Rudy would beat either of their two front runners, and thus switch to Edwards. The oBserver has gone slightly the other way, and decided that Rudy would also beat Obama or Clinton, but that the Democrats won't realise that in time. [url=http://observer.guardian.co.uk/7days/story/0,,2165267,00.html]http://observer.guardian.co.uk/7days/story...2165267,00.html[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?