REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

the effort was put in because it was stated that current hurdlers aren't very good..or the last 20 years worth..the benchmark method shows thats not actually the case..as does the original +7 theory

when i read..but such and such only beat 160 hurdler..that needs putting in context with the chase level to make it more relevant...160 hurdlers are 169 horses as we generally think of chasers

as we have lots of chat about ratings..on this forum its very relevant

[QUOTE="EC1, post: 2529870, member: 65360"] the effort was put in because it was stated that current hurdlers aren't very good..or the last 20 years worth..the benchmark method shows thats not actually the case..as does the original +7 theory when i read..but such and such only beat 160 hurdler..that needs putting in context with the chase level to make it more relevant...160 hurdlers are 169 horses as we generally think of chasers as we have lots of chat about ratings..on this forum its very relevant [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?