REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

Sanctuaire's 166-rating is all wrong in the first place though, Tanlic, hence why SS didn't put up anything like a 185 performance. To rate SS at 185, you basically have to award Kunbeshwar a mark in the late-160's and there is no way the horse is within a stone of that kind of mark.

Sanctuaire's rating needs to be ignored for the purposes on assessing Sprinter Sacre's performance, imo, and it makes much more sense to rate SS through Kumbeshwar.

[QUOTE="Grasshopper, post: 2415329, member: 65342"] Sanctuaire's 166-rating is all wrong in the first place though, Tanlic, hence why SS [I]didn't[/I] put up anything like a 185 performance. To rate SS at 185, you basically have to award Kunbeshwar a mark in the late-160's and there is no way the horse is within a stone of that kind of mark. Sanctuaire's rating needs to be ignored for the purposes on assessing Sprinter Sacre's performance, imo, and it makes much more sense to rate SS through Kumbeshwar. [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?