REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

So SS's mark is wrong, Sanctuaire's mark is wrong, and Kumbeshwar's is likely to be wrong when he's re-assessed..........this just gets better and better.
A sane and reasonable method might conclude that good, consistent and progressive horses like SS and Kumbeshwar might improve a little in the race; not so Sanctuaire, but the sane and reasonable approach wouldn't have him finding 23lbs or so in his previous 2 races.
But who needs common sense, when we can have ratings bouncing up and down all over the place.

<blockquote data-quote="reet hard" data-source="post: 2415330" data-attributes="member: 65927">So SS&#039;s mark is wrong, Sanctuaire&#039;s mark is&nbsp; wrong, and Kumbeshwar&#039;s is likely to be wrong when he&#039;s re-assessed..........this just gets better and better.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />A sane and reasonable method might conclude that good, consistent and progressive horses like SS and Kumbeshwar might improve a little in the race; not so Sanctuaire, but the sane and reasonable approach wouldn&#039;t have him finding 23lbs or so in his previous 2 races.But who needs common sense, when we can have ratings bouncing up and down all over the place.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="reet hard, post: 2415330, member: 65927"] So SS's mark is wrong, Sanctuaire's mark is wrong, and Kumbeshwar's is likely to be wrong when he's re-assessed..........this just gets better and better.:) A sane and reasonable method might conclude that good, consistent and progressive horses like SS and Kumbeshwar might improve a little in the race; not so Sanctuaire, but the sane and reasonable approach wouldn't have him finding 23lbs or so in his previous 2 races. But who needs common sense, when we can have ratings bouncing up and down all over the place.:D [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?