REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do much without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view all discussions - and most importantly, you haven't joined our community. What are you waiting for? Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Join Talking Horses here!

Reply to thread

Message

The criticism is pretty harsh. That was no better and no worse than what C4 had been serving up, and it was the first programme. On the whole it was watchable, far from perfect though, but in truth perfect is often less watchable. I'd say they deserve some credit for a first time up effort, and that was a reasonable platform to build from.

The bottom line is there's only so much you can do with racing coverage, and the chemistry is more important than the infill content. Give them time I say.

[QUOTE="Maruco, post: 2420899, member: 65063"] The criticism is pretty harsh. That was no better and no worse than what C4 had been serving up, and it was the first programme. On the whole it was watchable, far from perfect though, but in truth perfect is often less watchable. I'd say they deserve some credit for a first time up effort, and that was a reasonable platform to build from. The bottom line is there's only so much you can do with racing coverage, and the chemistry is more important than the infill content. Give them time I say. [/QUOTE]

Verification: 5 + 3 = ?