USA Today

BrianH

At the Start
Joined
May 3, 2003
Messages
6,108
Location
Banstead, Surrey
Michigan artist sentenced to jail over mural nudity

By Joanne Laurier
24 February 2005


In a particularly philistine and backward act, artist Edward Stross was sentenced to prison last week for his mural depicting a bare-breasted figure on a building in Roseville, Michigan, in suburban Detroit. The artist was ordered by District Judge Marco Santia to serve 30 days in jail, do two years of probation and pay a fine of $500 for his variation of Michelangelo’s “Creation of Man,” illustrating a half-naked Eve. Stross was also mandated to alter the fresco, which he painted on the outside of his art gallery in 1997.

After covering the breast with a black cloth, Stross explained to reporters that he was in mourning for artists everywhere. “Removing the work is the ultimate punishment. The jail time is nothing compared to removing what I painted. ... They’re trying to paint me out as a criminal.”

At Stross’ trial, Roseville resident Jim Goldwater spoke in support of the artist, telling jurors that Stross volunteered at a local homeless shelter and has created a number of murals in the community for free. He added, “I think it’s disgusting, to be honest with you.”

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Michigan filed an emergency motion to keep him out of jail pending an appeal of the sentence. On Tuesday the ACLU obtained a stay until March 5. City officials are apparently quite determined to see Stross jailed. Roseville city attorney John Dolan told the Macomb [County] Daily, “We don’t believe there is a basis for a stay. He was convicted by a jury of his peers.” Continued Dolan: “There also aren’t any constitutional claims that we think have any likelihood of prevailing in this case.”

In a press release, national ACLU Legal Director Michael J. Steinberg commented, “It is disturbing that an artist can be imprisoned for replicating a masterpiece from the Sistine Chapel on the side of his art studio.”

Stross, 43, told the Detroit Free Press: “This is one of the world’s most famous paintings. This is not my work. It is Michelangelo’s, and all I am trying to do is brighten up our community. ... They’re trying to turn my message into something it’s not.”

Wendy Wagenheim, Communications Director of the Michigan ACLU, explained to the WSWS that Stross had a “good case” which involved the constitutional right to free speech. “Not only should he not be jailed,” she commented, “for replicating classical art, but Mr. Stross has multiple sclerosis and jail is certainly not the right place for someone with a disability.”

Stross collapsed in his studio Tuesday and was taken by ambulance to St. John Hospital. His brother told the media, “The stress over this fight got to be just too much.”

A number of Michigan artists have spoken out against Stross’ victimization. “If it’s good enough for the Sistine Chapel, it’s good enough for Roseville,” said Lauren Cerand, spokesperson for Emerging Arts.

Jef Bourgeau, who faced obscenity charges in Pontiac, Michigan, in 2000 for displaying classical art such as Gustave Courbet’s “The Origin of the World,” told the WSWS: “It’s an absurd case. I had the same experience in Pontiac. Stross’ is a folk version of Michelangelo. There is more nudity in your average church. Sex has become one of the main focuses since the Christian right has gained influence. There has been an increasing preoccupation by the right wing with what is quite normal in art.

“To show you how the pendulum has swung, in 1989, Christina Orr-Cahill, art director of the Corcoran Gallery in Washington, DC, was fired for canceling the Robert Mapplethorpe [a controversial photographer] show. Today such a person would be promoted as a hero, like [former New York mayor Rudolph] Giuliani for censoring the ‘Sensation’ exhibition. Art is becoming a target because it is the one thing that can speak out against what is happening. Art has always caused trouble because it is visual and creates a focal point in a real way. Genuine art takes an oppositional stance. The case against Stross should be thrown out.”

Tyree Guyton is a Detroit painter and sculptor. In an ongoing effort in the 1980s and 1990s, Guyton created the Heidelberg Project, an artistic transformation of two city blocks of blight on Detroit’s east side. The renowned open-air installation—a standing reminder of the city’s social decay—has been continuously attacked by city officials and was partially bulldozed under the administration of Coleman Young.

Tyree and his associate, Jenenne Whitfield, spoke with the WSWS about the Stross case. “It’s really ridiculous, making an issue out of breasts. We’ve got a war that we’re fighting, spending all kinds of money. People are dying and here they’re talking about breasts,” said Tyree.

Jenenne interjected: “An atmosphere of fear is deliberately generated by the powers that be. They want people to walk around with blinders. When people feel that they can’t be heard—that’s a dangerous situation.”

“People who don’t know anything about art are making these kinds of decisions,” added Tyree. “They are afraid of art that talks about what is happening. Here is an artist that painted a picture on his own private property. Where is the first amendment freedom of speech? We can send kids to Iraq. American soldiers can torture people all over the globe. And in Detroit, they are getting rid of art programs and closing down the schools. Something is definitely wrong with this picture.”

In near-identical circumstances, the ACLU filed suit in January against the city of Pilot Point, Texas—north of Dallas—and its police department for coercing an art gallery owner, Dwight Miller, into removing a version of Michelangelo’s “Creation of Adam” on the exterior wall of his gallery. Miller was also forced to cover the mural after police threatened to arrest him under a pornography statute.

“It is unconstitutional for government officials to censor a work of art because it might offend a small group of people,” said ACLU of Texas Director Will Harrell. “It is also a misuse of resources to have our law enforcement officials act as art critics.”

The Pilot Point police repeatedly threatened to prosecute Miller under a criminal statute that targets those who abuse children by selling or displaying hard-core pornography. In response, Miller covered Eve’s breasts with a banner that read “Crime Scene.”

“The threats against Mr. Miller by law enforcement were baseless and wholly inappropriate. The Farmers and Merchant’s Gallery mural is no more pornographic than the Sistine Chapel or countless other works of art portraying classical nude figures,” argued the ACLU director.
 
You think that is bad ? Today i saw an application for an ASBO that alleged that a child had kicked a ball in a puddle ! As far as civil liberties are concerned we have nothing to be proud about
 
No it is a matter of concern that local authorities are bringing proceedings on this basis . It is a waste of public money , it criminalises children in their own minds as much as anything else who are guilty of no more than mucking about and a f*cking disgrace
 
I agree that the council's behaviour is disgusting but not surprising . Smalltown America at it's worst but pay heed to this tale . Last night the house opposite us got shot up , you might call it a paramilitary asbo . Noone was hurt thankfully but noone in Detroit gets shot at for offending their neighbour .Just gives you some perspective . So much for the ceasefire .
 
"No one in Detroit gets shot at for offending their neighbour"
I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree with you there - In the city of Detroit last year there were 402 murders. That works out to 41.79 per 100,000 people. The national average in the USA, which is high when compared with other western countries, is 5.6 per 100,000 people.

In 2000 the figures for these islands were:

Northern Ireland - 2.84
Scotland - 2.11
England & Wales - 1.61
Republic of Ireland - 1.48

Now, I don't want to make light of the tragedies in Northern Ireland over the last twenty-five years or so and, as you say, there is still a long way to go, but my best estimate would be that the rate is lower now than it was in 2000 and even then it was one fifteenth of that in the city of Detroit in 2004. I would argue, though milions in America would disagree with me, that it doesn't help that anyone can go and buy a gun in a high street shop or out of town shopping centre.
 
Oh, ho, ho, my aching sides! From the country that brings the world $19 BILLION 'worth' of pornography every year - cover up them titties, you filthmonger!

I'm not sure, though, that artists prattling on about Art standing for the 'oppositional side' (the wot?) are talking sense, rather than being self-serving - that knocks out most of our own RAs and a huge swathe of very creative American artists of the past century, from Alexander Calder's monster mobiles to Cy Twombly's 'scribbles' and the very uncontroversial works of David Hockney (yes, yes, I know he's English, but he's working and living in the USA).

Robert Mapplethorpe's contributions in his 1999 exhibition featured males (and himself, I think) with objects stuck up their rectums. To be honest, I think much of that was an exercise is homoerotic-masochism, which would have fit right in with the offerings from Los Angeles' biggest 'entertainment' industry. If he'd put it on film, rather than on stills, it'd be playing over and over in many a sticky-sheeted boudoir. Call it porn, it sells. Call it art - take it down, you pervert!

America is schizoid (well, after September 11 it's paranoid-schizoid), and always has been, in its' ambivalent (some say hypocritical) attitude to matters sexual or merely physical. Its' problem is, it can't tell the difference.
 
Sorry if I posted an exagerated comparison . My concern was fueled by 2 UVF blokes deciding it was ok to pebbledash a house 20yds away from me for them partying too much . Some might call that terrorism. Why are we concerned with American deaths when these deaths are happening on our doorstep in the UK ?
American comparisons are neither here nor there . It's not a sociology class . My point is that criminality and terrorism are alive and well in Northern Ireland God help us
 
How about this one then? No wonder satire is almost dead!

From my local newspaper:

School's fight for right to smack

Christian establishment may take case
to European Human Rights Court after
losing in Law Lords


An Epsom school which failed in its legal bid to bring back corporal punishment for its students could now appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.

The Cornerstone School was one of four independent Christian schools which claimed the ban on smacking children infringed their human rights. (My italics - BrianH)

The schools said administering physical punishment was part of their Christian beliefs and taught children that unacceptable behaviour would not be tolerated.

Lawyers for the claimants had quoted biblical passages in court, such as: "He who spares the rod hates his son".

The House of Lords was also told that the proposed punishment would take the form of administering a thin, broad flat paddle to both buttocks in a firm, controlled manner.

But last Thursday five law lords unanimously ruled the reintroduction of smacking was "not in the best interests of children".

Lady Hale ruled: "If a child has a right to be brought up without institutional violence, as he does, that right should be respected whether or not his parents and teachers think otherwise".

The case, which also involved the Chriatian Fellowship School at Edge Hill, Liverpool, Bradford Christian School at Idle, Bradford and Kings School at Eastleigh, Hampshire, had already been thrown out by both the High Court and the Court of Appeal.

However, Graham Davies, head teacher at the Cornerstone, is now considering taking the fight to the European Court of Human Rights.

Mr Davies believes that society has disintegrated since the Education Act 1996 banned smacking from all schools. He told the Epson Guardian "It's all about context. If someone sticks a knife into someone else, we would all agree that is wrong. But if a surgeon does it to his patient, that is OK because he is doing good.
The reason for disciplining children is to protect them and give them clear boundaries for behaviour. We had a clear procedure and would discuss it with parents, who would often come in to administer the punishment."
____________________________________________________________________

Yoy couldn't invent it, could you?

I don't know about satire, I can imagine the appeal to the Lords being reconstructed for a drama documentary with the cast including John Cleese, Michael Palin, Terry Jones, Eric Idle and the late Graham Chapman.

"My Lord, I'd like to call the prophet Leviticus...."

Mind you, the biggest laugh must be from the lawyers acting for the schools - "Yes, headmaster, a definite breach of human rights - if we don't succeed in the High Court we're a shoo-in at the Court of Appeal. And anyway, if that goes wrong the House of Lords will rule in our favour and, in the unlikely event of that not working out we'll be a laydown certainty at the European Court of Human Rights....
By the way, have we tendered our interim account?"
 
"Look, Mrs Ramsbottom, we've begged and begged young Letitia to behave. But she just won't. She's deliberately being disruptive, and she insists that we beat her. Yes, she says it'll be character-forming, and that so far your liberal way of life hasn't done much towards that. What on earth are we to do? If we beat her, that infringes our human rights to not to have to beat someone, but if we don't, apparently we're infringing hers to be beaten... hallo? Mrs Ramsbottom? Hallo?"
 
Delighted to inform you that application for ASBO dismissed with costs against the Council
 
Back
Top