I don’t have a problem with horses being euthanised as long as it’s done humanely - a lot worse things can happen to a horse than death. I also think if we ate horsemeat in this country an awful lot of welfare issues would be able to be sorted fairly easily. It’s not so long ago that people were worrying about the lack of young stock because breeders took a pull for a season or two - you can’t have it both ways. I do think there should be very stringent criteria brought in for breeding stock, but lots of people don’t agree.
As for rehoming, as kirsty says - it’s heartbreaking seeing some of the adverts on social media especially as you see some horses pop up over and over. In that ideal world everyone would have acres of land and stables and be able to keep their horses forever, but that’s just not going to happen. Owners should be more responsible for what happens to their horses, but where do you draw the line there? Do you take it right back to the breeder because without them there wouldn’t be a horse in the first place? If people were honest about their ability to have a thoroughbred then many issues wouldn’t get the chance to happen. Ive told a lot of people that I think they aren’t ready for a TB as well as getting a lot to fall in love with a breed they didn’t even consider because of the reputation. There are many rehoming centres up and down the country - most of them well established before ROR appeared, but they all have the common goal of wanting to do the best they can to support racehorses in their futures, be that as competition horses, hacks, family pets or companions. There are also a lot of trainers who rehome from the yard - but that’s not always a good situation for the horses, like most things though, some trainers are better with that than others.
It’s always been a tricky one and there isn’t an easy answer for it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk