An interesting read

Diamond Geezer

Gone But Not Forgotten
Joined
May 2, 2003
Messages
13,884
Former Cheltenham Racecourse boss Edward Gillespie looks at the careers of champion jockeys, Published in the Gloucester Echo.


FORMER Cheltenham Racecourse boss Edward Gillespie spent 32 years glorious years at the home of jump racing.

Here, he looks at the careers of champion jockeys.

The names in the record books of the four champion jockeys in the past 32 years are John Francome, Peter Scudamore, Richard Dunwoody and AP McCoy.

Four more varied individuals are hard to imagine, out of the saddle.

John is truly multi-talented. An outstanding rider across all disciplines, he is also an exceptional player of both tennis and the piano.

He builds houses with his bare hands, writes thrillers and has a nerve and enough skill to accompany Tiger Woods around a golf course.

He gave up after-dinner speaking when it got boring, which was regrettable for those denied his ability to tell a tale, once shocking the 300 guests at the Champion Jockey's Dinner when a punch line required John to stand on the table.

Of all the jockeys I have spent time with, John was number one for keeping an eye out for a young colleague who has been wrongly blamed by a trainer, in front of the disappointed owner, for getting beaten when the horse was plainly not fit.

Once he was back in the changing room, the champion would have an arm round him and a cup of tea in his hand.

Clive Cox trains at John's stables and I hope we can find another way of knowing when to add our support to one of Clive's runners now John will be no longer on the Channel 4 racing team.

Where John is all natural talent, honed by expert tuition and topped off by hours of practice, Peter Scudamore is work, work, work and sheer determination.

His father Michael was a top jockey in his day and Peter applied himself to reaching the top from a very early age.

Wherever there was a chance of a ride and to widen his experience, Peter would be on the way.

That took him to riding for several short seasons in Norway, for example, where he and his father campaigned successfully and are highly respected.

In those years when Peter won race after race from the front on Martin Pipe's super-fit horses, they so dominated the two championships that their competitive edges made it imperative to introduce a third championship – between each other.

Martin would have much pleasure letting Peter know about a couple of winners at the other meeting just as Peter would in getting on a winning spare ride.

It was a match made in heaven for punters looking for thorough preparation and uncomplicated delivery.

Then came a glut of good horses that won the partnership every big Saturday race. They adored each other.

Richard Dunwoody acknowledged he was never going to be champion while Peter was around.

When Peter made the surprising announcement of his retirement, the vacancy with Martin Pipe was too good to turn down and the winners came thick and fast.

As he has proved since with his polar expeditions, for Richard quantity is of far less interest than the quality of the challenge.

Winning the championship with Martin was out of character but something he needed to get behind him.

Winning the Grand National or a top race in USA was far more to his liking.

Not being able to decide for himself when to call it a day and being forced to quit by injury was always going to be a problem for this control-freak.

After he proved he could establish a successful business career that included publishing football programmes, Richard found bigger challenges in the big outdoors.

Sixteen championships and the growing possibility that the magic 300 in a season is still a reality sets AP McCoy well apart from the rest.

Once pain is taken out of the equation, almost anything is within scope.

Seeing the physique of jockeys when all they are wearing is a towel opens the eyes to what these maniacs put themselves through.

There was an evening when Peter Scudamore was referred to hospital when the racecourse doctor could not identify what turned out to be an extra band of muscle in his stomach.

He and others frequently rode with broken collar-bones. Occasionally, a shoulder was not too good either.

April is not a good month for AP's physique.

There's not much to like about it the rest of the year so, unless you are a fan of scars and suffering, avert your eyes.

That all proved to be worthwhile when he exploded with celebration when Don't Push It won his Grand National and Synchronised won the Gold Cup, making the pain bearable for him and for us.

When we lost Synchronised in the Grand National, we very nearly lost AP.

That is a measure of how special he is and how important it is that he reaches 300 this season, next season or very soon after that.

A lifetime of changes have occurred over the past 30 seasons

Graham Lee has achieved the unthinkable this year, riding over 100 winners on the Flat after converting from a successful career as a jump jockey.

This has prompted AP McCoy to consider the necessity of every part of his body as he comes to terms with a weight that makes such an alternative route to extend his riding for another couple of decades impossible.

In comparison with their Flat racing counterparts, jump jockeys have the worst of it for injuries and the inevitable calling of time when they approach 40.

In the 30 years I have seen them at close quarters, their attitude, camaraderie and passion for the sport leave me in no doubt there are many more sporting legends than will be remembered on the championship roll of honour.

In 32 seasons, there have been just four champions.

In 1980-81, John Francome headed the list with 105 winners, a total that had only been exceeded seven times to that date.

That was achieved from 574 rides, the second highest number after Stan Mellor's 608 two decades earlier.

AP McCoy cruised past 105 for this season during November and has already completed well over 500 rides.

The number of jump racing fixtures has changed very little over that period, remaining at around 550, but several major changes have occurred.

When John Francome finished the season in 1981, in was late May and his next ride in the UK would be seven weeks later.

That all changed when summer jumping was introduced.

Opportunities increased by not just seven weeks but by the thinning out of fixtures across the calendar, 50 more on Sundays and an end to those 12 fixtures on Boxing Day which stretched jockey availability to the limit.

Jockeys can now ride at more than 50 per cent of the fixtures, and while self-regulation has been introduced, life-style pressure comes from too much racing rather than not enough.

Their diets and medical support have improved out of all recognition and fitness levels are maintained despite long journeys.

With fixtures spread more evenly though the winter alongside all-weather racing, far fewer are lost to bad weather and, when they are, additional fixtures are scheduled and major races are saved.

Courses are now far better drained and lay frost covers to reduce risk of abandonment.

It can still go horribly wrong, as was the case with the foot and mouth disease outbreak in 2001 when the end of the season was devastated, but generally the top jockeys have far greater opportunity to maximise their winners and income than ever before.

As a result, there are far fewer opportunities for those lower down the pyramid of jockey talent and the number of professional jockeys, currently well below 100, has fallen to less than half the number 30 years ago.

Another factor that may be short-term is the concentration of so many of the top horses in so few yards.

The differential between the value of the most valuable and least valuable races has never been wider and jockeys who are unlikely to get a share of the big money find making a living from the sport incredibly challenging.
 
Thanks, Geezer, I enjoyed that. A lot of people didn't like the way he pushed up prices at Cheltenham but he shows in this article that he certainly writes well, has some interesting insights and makes some good points.
 
Another item by yer man on the changing face of television coverage


Racing authorities are only very occasionally faced with decisions that affect those who do not attend race-meetings.

The vast majority of the time, they strive to improve the racing experience for those they persuade to leave the comfort and convenience of their homes to travel the required distance, find the venue, handle car parking issues or those inherent with public transport, pay for admission and view the racing from a distance with limited information.

Much of their management attention will be focused on how best to keep the customer entertained and amused between the relatively brief periods of sporting activity.

The sales proposition is that by seeing the sport 'live', racegoers become infected by the atmosphere and thrill to the first-hand experience of 'being-there'.

By the time they get home, having calculated the cost or profit on the day, those who attended will catch up on the news and reviews, most likely watching recordings of the day's sport.

From the outset of televised racing, way back in the late 1950s, views have been expressed on where the balance ideally lies between showing sufficient coverage of racing on television to interest the public, encouraging them to participate by attending and betting, and not showing so much that there is really no incentive for them to leave their living rooms.

Taken to an extreme, by maximising revenue streams from television contracts and through the gaming economy, it is now possible for some parts of the sport to thrive with virtually nobody in attendance.

For all-weather courses, gate receipts pale into insignificance compared with earnings from satellite television and, most importantly the contract for putting pictures into betting shops.

During the recent eight-day sequence of fixtures at Lingfield, 17 people paid for entry on one day.

'Crowds' there and at the likes of Kempton and Southwell are frequently fewer than 100.

They are all, very much, going concerns and would like to race even more frequently.

Cheltenham sits at the other end of the sport's spectrum. Of the annual turnover approaching £30 million, a very small proportion directly comes from broadcast television, satellite or the supply of pictures to betting shops.

Many of us caught our first glimpse of racing at Cheltenham on television.

For me, it was in the 1960s when BBC Grandstand gave my family access to a wide range of sport from rugby internationals to motorcar hill climbs at a curious place called 'Rest and be Thankful'. Horseracing was the perfect length and shape for Grandstand, providing four 15-minute sessions that interlaced other activities.

What I remember is not a stirring, heart-stopping finish but the calm and anticipation of horses walking round at the two-and-a-half-mile start.

'The Voice', Peter O'Sullevan would then, quietly, let you know who was who, occasionally breaking the natural sounds of horses galloping and brushing over fences or hurdles. I was captivated.

I was immediately faced with the dilemma of taking my new passion no further and just relying on television coverage or making all that effort to travel to Cheltenham, to see it for myself but without 'The Voice' and those wonderful images.

Twenty-five years later, I was at the very centre of another dilemma.

BBC and Cheltenham had enjoyed a massively successful partnership over 40 years.

The coverage was iconic but times were changing.

New kid on the block Channel 4 had made an audacious bid three years earlier that Racecourse Holdings Trust, owners of Cheltenham, had not taken seriously and that resonated with Channel 4's chief Michael Grade.

For this round of negotiation, Grade made a personal appearance and left everyone in the room with no doubt of his appetite to give racing a leading role in their output and to approach it with energy and innovation that the incumbent, BBC, could not match.

We were faced with either taking the comfortable route of 'same again' BBC or using this opportunity to articulate how we hoped Cheltenham could be seen, relating to a whole new generation of audience.

To make the decision harder, there was not a great difference in the financial offers. We were looking at decision based on culture and personalities.

The battle lines were drawn up around the stations' stars – those who despaired of us even considering departing from Peter O'Sullevan and those expressing high anxiety that we should open our doors to that 'dreadful' John McCririck.

To make the negotiations a little more difficult, BBC Outside Broadcasts were experiencing industrial action, protracting the process.

The lobby of a hotel in Oxford became our regular meeting place with the different parties.

When the phone rang at 4.10 one Friday and my contact at BBC told me an announcement was being sent out at 5pm, saying Cheltenham had walked away from a partnership that stretched back 40 years, my heart took a couple of extra beats.

The final offer to Channel 4 had not quite been accepted. Thirty minutes and a couple of calls later, the deal was sealed and Cheltenham was looking ahead to a new era.

There was concern that if the TV coverage became too brilliant, there would be greater temptation for would-be customers to stay at home.

However, as our relationship with Channel 4 developed, attendances grew.

We experimented with allowing more than four races to be broadcast from the Festival and the upward trend continued. In turn, that attracted more sponsors.

Our relationship with BBC was not lost entirely. Through Radio Five Live, Radio Gloucestershire and other local stations following their heroes to the Festival, the event build-up is wider than ever before.

The radio audience for the big Festival races is larger than the TV audience and talk of Clare Balding making her debut in the coverage next year is uninformed. Clare has been a key player on the radio coverage for many years.

Contrastsd between the media coverage over three decades are stark.

As the Festival has got longer, it has also got bigger. New media has given the racecourse, owners, trainers, riders and support teams a whole new dimension.

Over 800 press are accredited each March.

There is demand for better access behind the scenes, which needs to be protected in the interests of integrity; live coverage is now multi-channel; Cheltenham Radio allows racegoers to be as well informed as those at home.

Big screens are being supplemented by personal small screens.

The Racecourse must keep up with the pace of development or the experience for those attending will slip back behind that of those who follow from afar.

Cheltenham is a phenomenally picturesque sporting venue.

A friendly voice in our ear, describing the scene and explaining the action is a vital ingredient.

As many a TV producer has reminded me, 'It's not rocket science. All we need do is point the cameras in the right direction and add a little magic.'

I wish the new production team who take over next year every success.

Losing Alastair Down from their line-up will deprive the team of the natural successor to Sir Peter and John Oaksey as the voice of Cheltenham but no doubt a new one will emerge.
 
Back
Top