C
CPGagie
Guest
I think I've just realised some of what he's doing, and you're right it doesn't make sense.
A week or so ago, someone was asking about the class of each racecourse. So I ran some queries to see, and looked for how many class 3 races or higher were run at each flat turf course in 2012.
He's obviously just looking at winning times and not using logic. As I mentioned, I suspect theres the wind factor, but also the changing of class of the course itself. Last year there wasn't one class 3+ race at Lingfield for example, which came as a bit of a surprise to me. He's setting his standards to 100 rated horses, which can only have been hypothetical in many instances. Courses with downhill gradients and sharp turns will be out of sync if he's projecting a faster time for the hypothetical 100 horses as if they were running on the level.
Still doesn't account for Newmarket though, but it does get very breezy there.
Heres that list I knocked up for the class of courses for 2012. I also worked out the percentage of class 3+ races which were run at the course. It doesn't paint a perfect picture, but I figured it would more or less show the quality of racing at each course.. A bit unrelated, but thought I'd toss it out there anyway...
ASCO - 93 (109) 85.32%
YORK - 91 (115) 79.13%
NEW(R)-80 (118) 67.80%
GOOD - 67 (125) 53.60%
CHES - 49 (103) 47.57%
NEW(J)-69 (155) 44.52%
DONC - 66 (169) 39.05%
NEWB - 45 (124) 36.29%
HAYD - 55 (152) 36.18%
SAND - 38 (107) 35.51%
EPSO - 26 (77) 33.77%
RIPO - 24 (95) 25.26%
PONT - 23 (105) 21.90%
AYR - 23 (114) 20.17%
SALI - 19 (101) 18.81%
LEIC - 13 (98) 13.26%
MUSS - 14 (110) 12.73%
WARW - 6 (51) 11.76%
WIND - 15 (138) 10.87%
NOTT - 12 (114) 10.53%
HAMI - 10 (99) 10.10%
THIR - 10 (103) 9.71%
NEWC - 9 (110) 8.18%
REDC - 8 (107) 7.48%
YARM - 11 (182) 6.04%
BEVE - 7 (125) 5.60%
CATT - 5 (117) 4.27%
CARL - 2 (56) 3.57%
BATH - 4 (149) 2.68%
BRIG - 1 (133) 0.75%
CHEP - 0 (82) 0.00%
FOLK - 0 (77) 0.00%
LING - 0 (76) 0.00%
A week or so ago, someone was asking about the class of each racecourse. So I ran some queries to see, and looked for how many class 3 races or higher were run at each flat turf course in 2012.
He's obviously just looking at winning times and not using logic. As I mentioned, I suspect theres the wind factor, but also the changing of class of the course itself. Last year there wasn't one class 3+ race at Lingfield for example, which came as a bit of a surprise to me. He's setting his standards to 100 rated horses, which can only have been hypothetical in many instances. Courses with downhill gradients and sharp turns will be out of sync if he's projecting a faster time for the hypothetical 100 horses as if they were running on the level.
Still doesn't account for Newmarket though, but it does get very breezy there.
Heres that list I knocked up for the class of courses for 2012. I also worked out the percentage of class 3+ races which were run at the course. It doesn't paint a perfect picture, but I figured it would more or less show the quality of racing at each course.. A bit unrelated, but thought I'd toss it out there anyway...
ASCO - 93 (109) 85.32%
YORK - 91 (115) 79.13%
NEW(R)-80 (118) 67.80%
GOOD - 67 (125) 53.60%
CHES - 49 (103) 47.57%
NEW(J)-69 (155) 44.52%
DONC - 66 (169) 39.05%
NEWB - 45 (124) 36.29%
HAYD - 55 (152) 36.18%
SAND - 38 (107) 35.51%
EPSO - 26 (77) 33.77%
RIPO - 24 (95) 25.26%
PONT - 23 (105) 21.90%
AYR - 23 (114) 20.17%
SALI - 19 (101) 18.81%
LEIC - 13 (98) 13.26%
MUSS - 14 (110) 12.73%
WARW - 6 (51) 11.76%
WIND - 15 (138) 10.87%
NOTT - 12 (114) 10.53%
HAMI - 10 (99) 10.10%
THIR - 10 (103) 9.71%
NEWC - 9 (110) 8.18%
REDC - 8 (107) 7.48%
YARM - 11 (182) 6.04%
BEVE - 7 (125) 5.60%
CATT - 5 (117) 4.27%
CARL - 2 (56) 3.57%
BATH - 4 (149) 2.68%
BRIG - 1 (133) 0.75%
CHEP - 0 (82) 0.00%
FOLK - 0 (77) 0.00%
LING - 0 (76) 0.00%