Good morning to you all,
I was at Aintree yesterday and I was shocked when the first show prices came up on the boards.
When I left my house both Murcia and Gaelic Warrior were both 8/1, but their first show price was 11/4.
I find this a bit strange on non handicap races. I don't think this happens at Cheltenham.
I guess you could argue that Gaelic Warrior was backed because Mullins had won the previous 2 races. But I don't buy that, after all it's not unusual for Mullins to win races.
Last night I noticed Dancing City, had also suddenly become the second favourite. When I looked a couple of days a go, I was surprised when he was at least 10/1, maybe even 20/1.
Has anyone got any thoughts, on what I consider to be strange betting patterns, in the Graded races at Aintree ?
I was at Aintree yesterday and I was shocked when the first show prices came up on the boards.
When I left my house both Murcia and Gaelic Warrior were both 8/1, but their first show price was 11/4.
I find this a bit strange on non handicap races. I don't think this happens at Cheltenham.
I guess you could argue that Gaelic Warrior was backed because Mullins had won the previous 2 races. But I don't buy that, after all it's not unusual for Mullins to win races.
Last night I noticed Dancing City, had also suddenly become the second favourite. When I looked a couple of days a go, I was surprised when he was at least 10/1, maybe even 20/1.
Has anyone got any thoughts, on what I consider to be strange betting patterns, in the Graded races at Aintree ?